Loss Methods of Analysis We do not employ a single set of objective criteria in evaluating every potential investment
opportunity. In our experience, each investment opportunity must be evaluated for its particular
risks and opportunities.
We employ high-level analysis to assess the initial attractiveness of an opportunity before
proceeding further with or rejecting an investment opportunity. Depending on the type of
investment strategy, as part of our evaluation we may perform background research, financial
modeling, qualitative assessment, and/or on-site or other in-person visits. If an investment team
decides an investment is worth pursuing, they make a proposal to the IFM Group Investments
Committee (“IFMIC”) or sub-committee for consideration.
Our IFMIC is responsible for the reviewing and approving private market investment
transactions, overseeing investment programs and portfolios and reporting to the IFM Board
Investment Committee (“BIC”). The BIC and IFMIC can approve, within mandate/product
guidelines, all IFM acquisitions and divestments up to a certain predetermined amount. . There
are also the IFMIC sub-committees who have the authority to make investment decisions under
a certain threshold amount. The Infrastructure Group, Private Equity Group and IFM Debt
Investments Group each operate as sub-committees of the IFMIC. Each sub-committee may
authorize acquisitions and divestments under an established amount.
Fund investors should refer to a Fund’s Governing Documents for a more detailed description of
the methods of analysis employed by the Firm, a Fund’s investment strategy and the risk of loss
associated with an investment in a Fund.
Investment Strategies IFM offers portfolio management across listed equities, private equity, infrastructure, debt and
private assets. The investment strategies employed by IFM vary among the different strategies;
however, IFM places an emphasis on ESG as described in Item 4, “Advisory Business,” above.
For a Managed Account, the strategy may also vary based upon the client’s risk tolerance and
investment objectives.
Risk of Loss We do not guarantee the success of any investment advice that we may provide our clients. Any
investment involves significant risk, including the risk of loss of all or substantially all capital
invested. The following is a brief description of some, but not all, of the risks involved in investing
in many of the types of investments that are typically included in client portfolios. Clients and
investors should carefully consider these factors along with other matters discussed in the
governing documents for the Fund, and consult these governing documents for a more fulsome
discussion of each Fund’s risk factors.
General Risks Currency and Exchange Rate Risk. A client may hold certain investments in financial instruments denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar or in financial instruments
which are determined with reference to currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. The value of a
portfolio’s assets may fluctuate with exchange rates in these currencies as well as with price
changes in the various other local markets and currencies.
Currency Hedging. Certain clients may enter into transactions or investments in relation to currency exchange risks in connection with investments that are held in currencies other than the
U.S. Dollars, to the extent that it is reasonably practicable and IFM determines it to be prudent.
IFM may employ hedging techniques through the purchase of swaps, derivatives and other similar
instruments. There can be no assurance, in such cases, that: (i) such hedges will (a) be available,
(b) be available at a reasonable cost, (c) be sufficient or (d) actually eliminate the risk of fluctuation
in the rates being hedged or (ii) that counterparties to any hedging transaction would perform as
expected. Further, if a client enters into hedging transactions such transactions may, while
reducing certain rate risks, themselves entail other risks that may result in the client obtaining a
poorer overall performance than if such party had not entered into any hedge.
Non-US Investments: Clients may invest in non-U.S. markets (which may include emerging market countries – see “Emerging Market Risk” below). Such investments may involve certain
factors not typically associated with investing in the United States, including risks relating to: (i)
currency exchange matters, including fluctuations in the rate of exchange of the U.S. dollar against
the applicable currency, and costs associated with conversion of investment principal and income
from one currency into another; (ii) differences in or the absence of uniform accounting, auditing
and financial reporting standards, practices and disclosure requirements, and differences in
government supervision and regulation; (iii) certain economic and political risks, including
potential exchange-control regulations and potential restrictions on non-U.S. investments; and (iv)
certain geographically specific risks (such as weather).
Emerging Market Risk: Clients may hold assets in countries considered to be “emerging markets” at the time of investment. These are countries that have started developing financial
markets but have yet to reach a mature stage of development. Many Latin American, Eastern
European and Asian countries are considered emerging markets. Emerging markets may have
increased risks due to political and social instability, including the potential for civil wars;
pervasiveness of corruption and crime; increased likelihood of nationalization of infrastructure;
and little or no government authority in supervising and regulating business and industry practices.
Many emerging market countries have experienced high rates of inflation for many years, which
has had and may continue to have significant negative effects on the economies of those countries.
Economies in individual emerging markets may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S.
economy in such respects as gross domestic product rate of growth, rates of inflation, exchange
rate depreciation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency and balance of payments
positions.
Regulatory Risks and Tax Risks Funds are Not Registered. None of the Funds will be registered as an investment company under the 1940 Act. Accordingly, the 1940 Act generally will not be applicable to the Funds. In
addition, certain Funds may not be registered in Australia or any other jurisdiction.
Imposition of Tax Regardless of Cash Distributions. There is a risk that Fund investors may be subject to a tax liability even though they do not receive any income from the Funds. Each
Fund formed as a Limited Partnership may generate taxable income for investors even though the
value of investors’ interests in such Fund has declined.
Investments in Private Equity Management of Controlling Interest in Assets. In certain instances where a client takes a controlling position in a private equity asset, it will rely on existing operating management teams
that have extensive experience in the day-to-day operations of these businesses. Consequently,
the operational success of such businesses, as well as the success of the client portfolio’s internal
growth strategy, will be dependent on the continued efforts of the management teams of such
businesses. Similarly, certain Funds may invest in another fund and, in such instances, will rely
on the continued efforts of the investee fund’s investment management team. The loss of key
personnel, or the inability to retain or replace qualified employees, could have an adverse effect
on the business, financial condition and results of operations of such companies. This could
negatively impact a client’s portfolio. In other cases in which a client takes a controlling interest
in a private equity asset, a client may rely on third parties, under services agreements with the client
and/or other third parties, to provide day-to-day operating management of investments.
However, there may be a limited number of operators with the expertise necessary to successfully
maintain and operate the particular business of an investee company and one may be difficult at
times to locate. Further, there can be no assurance that these arrangements will lead to successful
performance or that the results will be as planned.
Liquidity Risks. Although private equity portfolio investments may generate some current income, they are expected to be generally illiquid. In addition, public sentiment and political
pressures may affect the ability of clients to sell one or more of its private equity assets. As a
result, it may be difficult from time to time for clients to realize, sell or dispose of a portfolio
investment at an attractive price or at the appropriate time or in response to changing market
conditions, or clients may otherwise be unable to complete a favorable exit strategy. Losses on
unsuccessful portfolio investments may be realized before gains on successful portfolio
investments are realized. Although some private equity assets may generate operating income, the
full return of capital and the realization of gains, if any, will generally occur only upon the partial
or complete disposal of an investment.
Valuation Risk. Private equity investments generally will be highly illiquid, and will most likely not be publicly traded or readily marketable. The Firm therefore, will not have access to readily
ascertainable market prices when establishing initial or quarterly valuations of the portfolio
investments and there may be a relative scarcity of market comparables on which to base the value
of the portfolio investments. For the purposes of valuing portfolio investments, IFM will appoint
independent external appraisers to determine the fair market value of such assets. While such
external appraisers will endeavor to determine and establish valuations of the portfolio
investments based on their estimates of the market values of such investments and valuation
principles they consider sound, given the nature of infrastructure assets, such valuation may be
difficult. Given the difficulty associated with forecasting variables, often many years into the
future, the capital value and expected cash returns from portfolio investments may be less than
expected.
Counterparty Risk. Counterparties are third parties that enter into contracts either directly with a Fund or with any of its portfolio investments. The long-term financial performance of a client
portfolio is partially dependent on the creditworthiness and performance of counterparties with
regard to a variety of agreements and arrangements. Clients are exposed to a risk of loss due to a
counterparty’s default. If a counterparty is unable or chooses not to meet its obligations, financial
or otherwise, clients may be adversely impacted.
Leverage Risk. Clients’ investments may include businesses and companies whose capital structures may have significant leverage. In addition, clients may from time to time incur leverage
as a result of, or in connection with, a variety of transactions or investments. While leverage
presents opportunities for increasing a portfolio’s total return, it has the effect of increasing
potential losses as well. Accordingly, any event which adversely affects the value of an investment
would be magnified to the extent a client portfolio is leveraged. The cumulative effect of the use
of leverage by a client portfolio in a market that moves adversely to a portfolio’s investments
could result in a substantial loss which would be greater than if a client portfolio was not leveraged.
Investments in Infrastructure Assets General Risks Associated with Investments in Infrastructure Assets: An investment in Funds is subject to certain risks associated with the ownership of infrastructure and infrastructure-
related assets in general, including: the burdens of ownership of infrastructure; local, national and
international economic conditions; the supply and demand for services from and access to
infrastructure; the financial condition of users and suppliers of infrastructure assets; changes in
interest rates and the availability of funds which may render the purchase, sale or refinancing of
infrastructure assets difficult or impractical; changes in environmental and planning laws and
regulations, and other governmental rules; environmental claims arising in respect of
infrastructure acquired with undisclosed or unknown environmental problems or as to which
inadequate reserves have been established; changes in energy prices; changes in fiscal and
monetary policies; negative economic developments that depress travel; uninsured casualties;
force majeure acts, terrorist events, under-insured or uninsurable losses; and other factors which
are beyond the reasonable control of the Funds. Many of these factors could cause fluctuations
in usage, expenses and revenues, causing the value of the Fund’s portfolio investments to decline
and negatively affecting each of the Funds and the Fund’s returns.
Operational and Technical Risks: Investments in infrastructure assets may be subject to operational and technical risks, including risk of mechanical breakdown, failure to perform
according to design specifications, labor and other work interruptions, and other unanticipated
events that adversely affect operations. There can be no assurance that any or all such risk can be
mitigated. An operating failure may lead to loss of a license, concession or contract on which a
portfolio investment may depend. The long-term profitability of an infrastructure project, once
constructed, is partly dependent upon efficient operation and maintenance of the project.
Inefficient operations and maintenance and, in certain infrastructure sectors latent defects in
acquired infrastructure assets, may adversely affect the returns of each of the Funds.
Regulatory risk: Many of the Fund’s portfolio investments are subject to different statutory and regulatory regimes, including those imposed by zoning, environmental, safety, labor and other
regulatory or political authorities. In addition, the adoption of new laws or regulations, or a change
in the interpretation of existing ones, or any of the other regulatory risks mentioned above could
have a material adverse effect on the Fund’s ability to meet its investment objectives. Statutory
and regulatory requirements may require a portfolio company to obtain numerous regulatory
approvals, licenses and permits. Failure to obtain or a delay in obtaining relevant permits or
approvals could hinder construction or operation and could result in fines or additional costs for
a portfolio company or the Fund, which could have a material adverse effect on such an
investment or investment returns generally.
Construction risks: The Fund may make investments in infrastructure projects during the construction phase, which will generally not produce income during such phase. To the extent
that the Master Fund invests in new infrastructure projects, there is a risk that the project will not
be completed within budget, within the agreed timeframe or to the agreed specifications. Delays
in project completion can result in an increase in total project construction costs and/or an
increase in debt service costs. Project delays may also delay the scheduled flow of project revenues
or result in late delivery penalties.
Contract risk: To the extent that a Fund invests in assets that are governed by concession agreements with governmental authorities (whether at the national, state, local, district or other
level), there is a risk that these authorities may not be able to or may choose not to honor their
obligations under such agreements, especially over the long-term. Government leases or
concessions may also contain clauses more favorable to the government counterparty than would
a typical commercial contract. For instance, a lease or concession may enable the government to
terminate the lease or concession in certain circumstances without requiring it to pay adequate
compensation. In addition, government counterparties also may have the discretion to change or
increase regulation of a Fund’s operations, or implement laws or regulations affecting the Fund’s
operations, separate from any contractual rights they may have. Governments have considerable
discretion in implementing regulations that could impact infrastructure assets, and because, in
many cases, infrastructure businesses provide basic, everyday services, and face limited
competition, governments may be influenced by political considerations causing them to make
decisions that adversely affect the Fund’s portfolio investments.
Litigation risk: Infrastructure assets are often governed by a complex series of legal documents and contracts. As a result, the risks of a dispute over interpretation or enforceability of the
documentation and consequent costs and delays may be higher than for other types of
investments. In addition, a Fund may be subject to claims by third parties (either public or
private), including environmental claims, legal action arising out of acquisitions or dispositions,
workers’ compensation claims and third party losses related to disruption of the provision of
infrastructure services by an infrastructure provider. Further, it is not uncommon for
infrastructure assets to be exposed to legal action from special interest groups seeking to impede
particular infrastructure projects to which they are opposed. If any of a Fund’s portfolio
investments become involved in material or protracted litigation, the litigation expenses and the
liability threatened or imposed could have a material adverse effect on the Fund.
Demand and user risk: The revenue generated by infrastructure and infrastructure-related assets may be impacted by the demand for the products or services produced by such assets (for
example, traffic volume on a toll road). Any reduction in demand and/or the number of users
may negatively impact the returns of a Fund. Demand for infrastructure assets may be subject to
seasonal variations which may increase or decrease revenues and profitability at various times
during the year, and which could affect the short-term returns of a Fund.
Strategic assets risk: The Fund may invest in or acquire assets that constitute significant strategic value to public and/or governmental bodies. The nature of these assets could generate additional
risks not common in other industry sectors. The national or regional profile of such assets and/or
their irreplaceable nature may increase the risk of terrorist acts or political actions. In addition,
the essential nature of the services provided by public infrastructure assets create a higher
probability that the services provided by such assets will be in constant demand. Accordingly, in
the event of the failure of such a strategic asset to make such services available, users of such
services may incur significant damage and may be unable to replace the supply of such services or
otherwise mitigate any such damage, thereby heightening the potential loss from third-party claims
against a Fund for such failures.
Catastrophic and force majeure risks: The Fund’s portfolio investments may be subject to catastrophic events and other force majeure events during their construction, technical and/or
operational phases. These events could include fires, floods, earthquakes, adverse weather
conditions, changes in law, eminent domain, wars, riots, terrorist attacks and similar risks, which
may be uninsurable or insurable at rates that the Master Advisor deems uneconomic. These events
could result in the partial or total loss of a portfolio investment, significant down time resulting in
lost revenues, and injury or loss of life, as well as litigation related thereto, among other potentially
detrimental effects.
Potential environmental liability: Large-scale infrastructure projects in which the Fund may invest may have a significant impact on their local environments, or be particularly susceptible to
events or changes in those environments or to requirements of political or administrative
authorities in respect of their environmental impact. In the United States, Europe and other
countries or regions, infrastructure projects are subject to numerous environmental laws and
regulations, some of which regulate air emissions of pollutants, such as sulfur dioxides, nitrogen
oxides, and particulate matters, and, in the case of generators, limits on the emissions of mercury.
Future environmental laws regulating infrastructure projects could become more restrictive, as
domestic and foreign governments aim to limit the impact of infrastructure on local wildlife and
natural resources and reduce the global emissions of greenhouse gases. In addition, an owner of
an infrastructure asset may be liable for past and future damages caused by environmental
pollutants located on, or emitted from, or otherwise attributable to the asset, as well as for the
costs of remediation and, in some circumstances, fines or other penalties. These liabilities may
exceed the value of the infrastructure asset at issue and may result in claims against the owner that
would result in the loss of other assets of the owner. While the Master Advisor will exercise
reasonable care to acquire infrastructure assets that do not present a material risk of such liabilities,
environmental liabilities may arise as a result of a large number of factors, including changes in
laws or regulations and the existence of conditions that were unknown at the time of acquisition
or operation.
Counterparty risk: Counterparties are third parties that enter into contracts either directly with the Fund or with any of its portfolio investments. The long-term financial performance of the
Fund is partially dependent on the creditworthiness and performance of counterparties with
regard to a variety of agreements and arrangements. The Fund is exposed to a risk of loss due to
a counterparty’s default. If a counterparty is unable or chooses not to meet its obligations,
financial or otherwise, the Fund may be adversely impacted.
Troubled infrastructure assets: The Fund may invest in assets or entities that are experiencing operational, financial or other difficulties. Portfolio investments in these assets or entities
generally require an extensive commitment of resources, including time, on the part of the Fund
and carry a greater risk that such an asset or entity may be involved in a bankruptcy proceeding.
In such an event, the Fund would be exposed to the risk of a proceeding of uncertain duration
and to the possibility of little or no return on its investment.
Corporate governance risk: Lack of appropriate shareholder rights, lack of transparency, lack of appropriate delegations, inadequate disclosure to the board of directors, inadequate risk
management systems, lack of overall board skills and mix, or lack of appropriate remuneration
and incentives can adversely impact performance of investments in infrastructure assets. All
governance factors must be appraised and mitigated by seeking appropriate shareholder rights and
ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations and internationally accepted standards of
corporate behavior.
Workplace health and safety: Investments in infrastructure assets may be exposed to liability from loss of life and equipment arising from inadequate workplace health and safety practices.
Due diligence must include a review of possible hazards, including a review of written policies,
practices and procedures to ensure that appropriate corrective action is taken to prevent accidents
or injuries arising from these hazards.
Climate change risk: Investments in infrastructure may be exposed to direct or indirect impacts of climate change. Direct impacts of climate change may include physical impacts such as
flooding, higher energy costs and changes in demand. Indirect impacts may include compliance
with legislation related to climate change. Lack of adaptation by infrastructure assets to manage
material risks associated with climate change can have adverse financial and operational impacts.
Cybersecurity Risk: Recent events have illustrated the ongoing cybersecurity risks to which
infrastructure assets are subject. To the extent that an investment in a Fund is subject to cyber-
attack or other unauthorized access is gained to an investment’s systems, such investment may be
subject to substantial losses in the form of stolen, lost or corrupted (i) customer data or payment
information; (ii) customer or entity financial information; (iii) entity software, contact lists or other
databases; or (iv) other items. In certain events, an investment’s failure or deemed failure to
address and mitigate cybersecurity risks may be the subject of civil litigation or regulatory or other
action. Any of such circumstances could subject an investment, or Funds, to substantial losses. In
addition, in the event that such a cyber-attack or other unauthorized access is directed at IFM, its
affiliates, or one of its service providers holding its financial or investor data, then IFM, its
affiliates or its Funds may also be at risk of loss, despite efforts to prevent and mitigate such risks
under the relevant policies.
Investments in Listed Equities Performance Risk. Individual investments within a strategy or enhancement technique may change in value due to circumstances specifically applicable to the relevant assets and may impact
negatively on portfolio value. For example, if the operations of an entity fail to perform, this may
lower returns from the investment in that entity.
Market Risk. Changes in market prices will impact the value of the portfolio. Market prices are influenced by a number of factors, including economic, political, technological and legal
conditions relevant to the Asset. Assets held by clients may fall in value.
Small Company Risk. Shares in smaller companies may trade less frequently and in smaller volumes and may experience greater price volatility than shares in larger companies. Smaller
companies may also have limited operating histories, markets, product lines or financial resources
than larger companies. They may also depend heavily on key personnel.
Investments inDebt Instruments and Fixed-Income Securities Interest Rate Risks. Certain client portfolios may include debt instruments and fixed-income securities. The value of such instruments and securities changes in response to fluctuations in
interest rates and in the perceived credit risk associated with a particular instrument/security and
its issuer. When interest rates decline, the value of fixed-rate debt instruments generally can be
expected to rise. Conversely, when interest rates rise, the value of fixed-rate debt instruments
generally can be expected to decline. In addition, to the extent that the receivables or loans
underlying specific securities are pre-payable without penalty or premium, the value of such
securities may be negatively affected by increasing pre-payments, which generally occur when
interest rates decline.
Credit Risk. An issuer or issuers may have difficulty meeting their next interest payment(s) or the repayment of principal. This may extend to an issuer’s default. Other counterparties also may
fail to perform contractual obligations in whole or part. This would negatively impact the value
of a portfolio. Further, deterioration in credit fundamentals of either a specific investment or
whole sector may occur, which may increase the credit margin and, as such, decrease the value of
the investments.
please register to get more info