MANGROVE PARTNERS


Mangrove Partners, a Cayman Islands exempted company established in 2010, provides investment management services on a discretionary basis to the Funds (defined below) which are privately offered pooled investment vehicles intended for sophisticated individual and institutional investors. (Mangrove Partners is referred to as “Mangrove” or the “Firm” in this Brochure and references to “us”, “we” and “our” also refer to Mangrove.) Mangrove is the investment manager for The Mangrove Partners Fund, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “US Feeder”), The Mangrove Partners Fund (Cayman), Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Cayman Feeder”), The Mangrove Partners i-Feeder 1, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “iFeeder”), The Mangrove Partners Fund (Cayman Drawdown), L.P., a Cayman Islands limited partnership (the “Drawdown Feeder”), The Mangrove Partners Fund (Cayman Partnership), L.P., a Cayman Islands limited partnership (the “Cayman Partnership”), and The Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Cayman Master”). Each of the foregoing funds is referred to individually as a “Fund” and collectively as the “Funds”. “Investor” refers to any investor in any of the Funds. Additionally, Mangrove Partners manages the assets of Insco Limited, a Bermuda insurance company, and United Americas Insurance Company (“UAIC”), a New York insurance company, which are both investments of the Cayman Master. Insco Limited’s and UAIC’s assets include investments in the iFeeder, which is invested in the Cayman Master. Mangrove Partners also manages a portfolio of fixed income securities for Insco Limited, under a separate investment management agreement.

An affiliate of Mangrove, Mangrove Capital, a Cayman Islands exempted company (“Mangrove Capital”), serves as the general partner of the Cayman Partnership and the Drawdown Feeder. An affiliate of Mangrove, Mangrove Capital II, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Mangrove Capital II”), serves as the general partner of the US Feeder. The US Feeder, the Cayman Feeder, the Drawdown Feeder, the iFeeder, and the Cayman Partnership, are constituents of a “master-feeder” structure for which the Cayman Master serves as the master fund. Each of the Funds is exempt from the registration requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”).

The Funds’ shared investment objective is to organically compound their net worth while minimizing the chances of a permanent loss of capital. Mangrove’s investment strategy concentrates on an identified subset of systematically underfollowed investments and inefficient markets. Our goal is to generate positive returns from both long and short investments as opposed to employing a relative value or market hedging strategy. Our investment process involves in-depth analysis and valuation work at the company level while being cognizant of underlying industry dynamics. Our deep value discipline in combination with our focus on underfollowed securities gives us our edge. Mangrove neither tailors its advisory services to the individual needs of investors in the Funds (“Investors”), nor accepts investor-imposed investment restrictions. For further details on the Mangrove’s investment strategy, please see Item 7 (“Types of Clients”) and Item 8 (“Methods of Analysis, Investment Strategies and Risk of Loss”) below. The principal owner of Mangrove is Nathaniel August. As of December 31, 2018, Mangrove manages on a discretionary basis approximately $1,021,783,614 of client assets, in net equity terms, and $353,580,000 of unfunded commitments. Mangrove does not currently manage any client assets on a non-discretionary basis. please register to get more info

Open Brochure from SEC website
Assets
Pooled Investment Vehicles $2,014,758,285
Discretionary $2,040,977,327
Non-Discretionary $
Registered Web Sites

Related news

Virtus Investment Partners Inc.

Stocks: Real-time U.S. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only; comprehensive quotes and volume reflect trading in all markets and are delayed at least 15 minutes. International ...

Where Do Hedge Funds Stand On Atlantic Power Corp (AT)?

becoming one of the largest hedge fund holders of the company. In terms of the portfolio weights assigned to each position Mangrove Partners allocated the biggest weight to Atlantic Power Corp ...

Where Do Hedge Funds Stand On Atlantic Power Corp (AT)?

becoming one of the largest hedge fund holders of the company. In terms of the portfolio weights assigned to each position Mangrove Partners allocated the biggest weight to Atlantic Power Corp ...

Traders Purchase High Volume of Call Options on Eiger BioPharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:EIGR)

Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:EIGR) was the recipient of unusually large options trading on Tuesday. Traders acquired 2,150 call options on the stock. This is an increase of 391% compared to the typical volume of 438 call options.

Do Hedge Funds Love Fly Leasing Ltd (FLY)?

there exists a few noteworthy hedge fund managers who were increasing their stakes significantly (or already accumulated large positions). More specifically, Mangrove Partners was the largest ...

Hedge Funds Are Dumping Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc.

and Nathaniel August’s Mangrove Partners was right behind this move, as the fund said goodbye to about $0.5 million worth. These transactions are interesting, as total hedge fund interest was ...

StoneMor Partners L.P.

Mangrove Partners Says Dissolves Passive Share Stake ... Quote and financial data from Refinitiv. Fund performance data provided by Lipper. All quotes delayed a minimum of 15 minutes.

Posts Tagged: IPR gang tackling

Luckily for Apple and Microsoft, however, VirnetX did not assert the ‘135 patent against Mangrove Partners, a hedge fund, which filed a petition for IPR against the ‘135 patent …

Posts Tagged: IPR gang tackling

Luckily for Apple and Microsoft, however, VirnetX did not assert the ‘135 patent against Mangrove Partners, a hedge fund, which filed a petition for IPR against the ‘135 patent …

Posts Tagged: IPR Joinder

Nidec argued that the Board improperly applied the joinder and time bar statutes. The Court held that it need not resolve this dispute because it affirmed the …
Loading...
No recent news were found.