Our Firm Aberdeen Asset Managers Limited (“AAML”) is headquartered in Aberdeen, United Kingdom, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aberdeen Asset Management PLC (“Aberdeen PLC”). As of August 14, 2017, further to the merger with Standard Life plc (the “Merger”), Aberdeen PLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Standard Life Aberdeen plc (“SLA”), which acts as parent to existing Aberdeen and Standard Life business units. The asset management business of SLA operates under the name Aberdeen Standard Investments (“ASI”). This document has been updated to reflect the current integration status of the legacy advisory businesses. It is expected that further integration activity will result in material changes requiring updates and delivery of this document. In addition to AAML, Aberdeen Standard Investments (Asia) Ltd., Aberdeen Standard Investments Management Australia Ltd., and Aberdeen Standard Investments Inc. are all wholly owned subsidiaries of Aberdeen PLC. Aberdeen Capital Management LLC and Aberdeen Standard Investments ETF Securities Advisors LLC are wholly owned subsidiaries of Aberdeen Standard Investments Inc.. Standard Life Investments (Corporate Funds) Limited and SL Capital Partners LLP, both based in Edinburgh, Scotland, are wholly owned subsidiaries of Standard Life Investments Limited (a subsidiary of SLA). Aberdeen Asset Managers Ltd, Aberdeen Standard Investments Inc., Aberdeen Standard Investments (Asia) Ltd., Aberdeen Standard Investments Australia Ltd., Aberdeen Capital Management LLC, Aberdeen Standard Investments ETF Securities Advisors LLC, Standard Life Investments (Corporate Funds) Limited, and SL Capital Partners LLP (collectively, “ASI” or “the Advisers”) are registered as investment advisers with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). In rendering investment advisory services, the Advisers may share resources, including personnel and facilities, and research information. The Advisers may also use the resources of other SLA subsidiaries. The Advisers have entered into Memorandums of Understanding and have elected to appoint as associated persons certain individuals who are employed by affiliated offshore unregistered advisers. These individuals render portfolio management, research and trading services to the Advisers' clients. AAML has been registered with the SEC as an investment adviser since 28 March 2012. AAML succeeded to the registration of its affiliate, Aberdeen Asset Management Investment Services Limited (AAMISL), following a merger of AAMISL into AAML on March 1, 2012. In anticipation of the loss of passporting rights for UK MiFID companies on Brexit, a project has been ongoing to transfer the group’s EU/EEA business to an Irish Mifid entity authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland (“CBI”), Aberdeen Standard Investments Limited (“ASIIL”). AAML has existing MIFID branches in France, Germany, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Norway and Sweden (“the branches”). The business of the branches (with the exception of Spain and Germany) transferred to ASIIL on 1 March 2019. The regulated business of AAML - Spain will transfer to ASIIL separately on 1 April 2019, due to additional regulatory and commercial steps that need to be completed prior to transfer of business. Following the transfer of business, AAML will maintain an unregulated branch in Spain. The business of the German Branch will move on 1 April 2019 to another intra-group entity; Aberdeen Standard Investments Deutschland AG, an AIFM with permission to perform marketing of units and shares in external investment funds as ancillary activities. Notification of de-authorisation of the branches has been made to the relevant host state regulators via the MIFID passport notification process. Advisory Services AAML provides its clients with discretionary and non-discretionary asset management and related services across a broad range of investment strategies and asset classes. Our business is predominantly the active management of financial assets, using first-hand research to make our investment decisions. Active investment spans equities, fixed income securities, and property. AAML also offers an alternative platform which encompasses multi-manager research, selection and portfolio management for hedge funds strategies (“Hedge Funds” or “Alternative Investment Strategies”). We may also serve as a manager of managers, in which circumstance we hire sub-advisers to provide day-to- day securities selection. We are responsible for selecting sub-advisers and determining the portion of a fund’s assets to be allocated to each sub-adviser. Additionally, we have a solutions business that can blend our abilities across different asset classes to provide tailored investment outcomes to meet specific client needs. This can incorporate skills in both quantitative equities and alternatives. See Item 8 (Methods of Analysis, Investment Strategies and Risk of Loss) for additional information regarding our advisory services. Our investment expertise is delivered through both segregated and pooled products – allowing us to serve a range of clients from institutions to private investors. We offer investment advisory services with regard to investments in both domestic and global securities to a variety of clients, insurance products, and pooled funds, including investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”). We provide a variety of asset management capabilities, including:
• managing or sub-advising various open-end or closed-end investment companies registered under 1940 Act;
• offering professional money management services for separately managed accounts, which include providing continuous advice to clients based on individual needs concerning the investment of funds and related activities including, but not limited to trading, cash management, and recordkeeping;
• providing investment services to international open-end and closed-end funds, collective investment trusts, and various private or institutional mandates sourced globally;
• offering investment services to certain limited partnerships and similar private funds;
• offering segregated and pooled vehicles focusing on European, or other global property mandates;
• offering global and regional fund of funds products (hedge fund, private equity, venture capital, real assets and property); and
• customizing solutions for clients, including but not limited to those seeking specific exposure or risk/return characteristics within their alternative investment allocations.

Tailoring Services to Client Needs We typically manage client accounts on a discretionary basis; however, we will manage client accounts on a non-discretionary basis subject to client instruction.

We make investments for clients in accordance with mutually agreed upon written investment guidelines and provide continuous supervision of client portfolios. Investment services may be tailored for each client’s specific needs and objectives, and clients may impose reasonable restrictions on investing in certain securities or types of securities. We have established procedures and controls to help ensure compliance with each client’s specific investment guidelines and any client-imposed restrictions.

Where we are the investment adviser to a pooled investment vehicle, investment objectives, guidelines and any investment restrictions are not typically tailored to the needs of individual investors in those vehicles, but rather are described in the prospectus or other relevant offering document for the vehicle. We create and maintain files supporting the rationales for these recommendations. The advisory or sub-advisory fee is subject to negotiation and is fully disclosed to clients. Upon request, clients may also receive investment advice on a more limited basis through advisory or consulting-like services, including advice on isolated areas of concern such as special projects or a specific topic. Clients wishing to engage ASI for consulting services will be required to enter into a written agreement and may be subject to certain fees and conditions.

We may, directly or indirectly, and without notice to other investors, enter into “side letter” agreements with certain prospective or existing investors (including investors affiliated with ASI) granting them, among other things, greater portfolio transparency, fee waivers or reductions, future capacity rights in a fund, interests or shares having different voting rights or restrictions, reduced minimum subscription amounts, additional rights to reports and other information and other more favorable terms than the terms that are described in the relevant offering memorandum. The funds that enter into these arrangements have no obligation to offer such differing or additional rights, terms or conditions to all interest holders, and ASI may or may not offer similar differing or additional rights, terms or conditions to other clients in customized discretionary accounts it manages or to non-discretionary accounts to which it provides investment advice. In rare instances where ASI is provided with enhanced portfolio disclosure (including potentially material non- public information concerning the portfolio holdings of an underlying fund pursuant to a confidentiality agreement with the underlying fund or its manager), ASI will not be able to share information concerning such holdings or information or the fact of the existence of such a confidentiality agreement with advisory clients unless specifically authorized to do so by the underlying fund or its manager. The relevant markets, risks, strategy, benchmarks, fees, expenses and other investment details will be detailed in the offering memorandum of the vehicle. Model Delivery/UMA AAML may provide non-discretionary investment advice whereby AAML provides investment recommendations in the form of a model portfolio to a sponsor or overlay manager which then utilizes all or part of the model in managing its clients’ accounts. Model delivery programs are often referred to as a Unified Managed Accounts (“UMAs”).

In such programs, the sponsor typically charges the client a comprehensive fee, inclusive of the advisory fee charged by AAML together with the fee for all other services being provided by the sponsor. The sponsor generally executes client portfolio transactions on behalf of ASI and provides custodial services for the client’s assets. Except for execution charges for certain transactions executed away from the sponsor, clients pay a single, all-inclusive (or “wrap”) fee charged by the sponsor based on the value of the client’s account assets for asset management, trade execution, custody, performance monitoring and reporting through the sponsor. The wrap fee often, but not always, includes the advisory fees charged by AAML and other participating managers through the program.

The Sponsor typically assists the client in defining the client’s investment objectives based on information provided by the client, aids in the selection of one or more investment managers to manage the client’s account, and periodically contacts the client to ascertain whether there have been any changes in the client’s financial circumstances or objectives that warrant a change in the management of the client’s assets. In certain Wrap Programs, the Sponsor contracts with other investment advisers to perform these services. In a Wrap Program, the Sponsor pays the investment advisers, such as AAML, a fee based on the assets of clients invested in the applicable strategy in the Wrap Program. In certain cases, AAML may instead be paid fees based on the size of the total Wrap Program assets under management. AAML may retain a portion of the wrap program fee when it participates as manager in wrap program arrangements.

Wrap fee accounts and other client accounts following a strategy with the same name managed by the same portfolio management team may be managed differently. For example, the Sponsor may impose investment restrictions or administrative requirements upon us in managing accounts that could cause those accounts to be managed differently from other client accounts in the same strategy managed by the same portfolio management team that were not subject to those restrictions or requirements. For example, if a Wrap Fee Program sponsor or client imposes investment restrictions on an account which prohibits investment in a security that is held in the selected strategy, the security may not be replaced with a comparable security and the client’s account may be overweight other positions or hold a larger cash position than other clients in that strategy.

Please also see the “Fees and Compensation” and “Brokerage Practices” items of this Brochure for more information on differences between wrap program arrangements and other types of client accounts. Assets under Management As of December 31, 2018, AAML had approximately 158,913,857,798 billion in assets under management (AUM) on a discretionary basis, and approximately $4,413,974,257 billion in assets under advisement on a non-discretionary basis, and total assets under management/advisement of approximately $163,327,832,055 billion. please register to get more info

ASI’s advisory fees are negotiable, and generally vary depending on the services being provided according to the schedule agreed to by the client and included in their investment management agreement. Fee arrangements will vary by client, and are based on a number of different factors, including investment mandate, services performed, and account size. Fees and allocations may be fixed, fixed plus performance or performance only. Please refer to Item 6 of this Brochure for additional information about performance- based fees. Generally, fees are paid monthly or quarterly in arrears based on assets outstanding at the close of each month, quarter or the average of the month-ends within a quarter, or in advance based on assets outstanding at the end of prior month or quarter, pursuant to the prospectus or other relevant offering document for the vehicle. We will either invoice clients for these fees, or in certain situations deduct these fees from the client’s custody account. In some instances, fee schedules are negotiable and can vary depending on a variety of factors such as the client, size of the account, and the investment strategy selected.

We will not generally be required to provide notice to, or obtain the consent of, one client when waiving, reducing or varying fees or modifying other contractual terms with any other client. However, some clients may from time to time seek to negotiate most favored nation (“MFN”) clauses in their investment management agreements with ASI. These clauses may require us to notify the MFN client if we subsequently enter into an investment management agreement with another client that offers more favorable pricing or other contractual terms than those currently offered to the MFN client. The applicability of an MFN clause will depend on the degree of similarity between clients, including the type of client, the scope of investment discretion, reporting and other servicing requirements, the amount of assets under management, the fee structure and the particular investment strategy (and therefore the relevant investment adviser) selected by each client. We have sole discretion over whether or not to grant any MFN clause in all circumstances.

All advisory arrangements may be terminated by either party upon prior written notice, according to the termination provisions outlined in the investment management agreement. If a contract is terminated, all advisory fees are subject to a pro-rata adjustment based upon the date of termination. Upon termination of the agreement, any prepaid, unearned fee will be promptly refunded, and any earned, unpaid fees will be due and payable.
For our standard segregated and/or commingled account fee schedules for U.S. clients and investors,
please refer to Appendix A of this brochure.

Registered Fund Fees With respect to U.S. SEC registered open-end and closed-end funds advised or sub-advised by ASI, each fund’s prospectus sets forth the applicable fees and expenses. On an annual basis, each Registered Fund’s Board of Directors/Trustees (the “Board”), including the independent Board members, considers renewal of the registered fund’s investment management services agreement, including the advisory fee paid by the registered fund to the investment manager. These fees are typically higher than the representative fee schedules shown in Appendix A.

Sub-advised Mutual Funds and Other Pooled Vehicle Fees We serve in a sub-advisory capacity for U.S. and offshore investment companies both registered and unregistered that are managed by third parties. Fees for such services are negotiated with the manager, and may be set forth in the fund’s registration statement or other similar offering document.

Wrap Programs AAML may participate in arrangements where it provides a model portfolio to clients but does not exercise investment discretion or trade in the account, including, but not limited to, those with UMAs of Wrap Program Sponsors. AAML’s actual fees, minimum fees, and minimum account sizes may be negotiable, and in arrangements where it provides a model portfolio, may be lower than those for providing investment advisory services where it has full discretion, depending on the circumstances. Payment of a bundled asset-based wrap fee may or may not produce accounting, bookkeeping, or income tax results better than those resulting from the separate payment of securities commissions and other execution costs on a trade-by-trade basis and advisory fees. Clients should contact their program Sponsor for more information on the fees payable to ASI in connection with such program. Alternative Investment Strategies (Hedge Funds) Investors and prospective investors should review the confidential private placement memorandum, limited partnership agreement and other governing documents (collectively, the “Governing Documents”) of each Hedge Fund in conjunction with this brochure for complete information on the fees and compensation payable with respect to that particular Hedge Fund. Different Hedge Funds and advisory accounts may be subject to different management fees and performance-based compensation arrangements. In certain circumstances, the advisory fees payable to AAML by individual investors are negotiable and are waived for certain investors.

AAML is authorized under the Governing Documents to charge and deduct advisory fees directly from the assets of the Hedge Funds. Payments of advisory fees are made in accordance with the terms set forth in the Governing Documents. Please refer to the Governing Documents of each of the Hedge Funds for complete information on the timing of advisory fee payments.

Management fees are generally paid quarterly in arrears, are tiered in some cases based upon the net assets under management for the Hedge Fund or account, are subject to breakpoint discounts in some cases based upon capital under management by AAML, and are generally up to 2.00% annually, as described in the relevant Governing Documents. The formulas for calculation of performance-based compensation arrangements vary by Hedge Fund but are generally up to 20% of investment performance, subject to a hurdle rate and/or loss, carry forward in some cases, as described in the relevant Governing Documents. Unless otherwise noted in the Governing Document, performance-based compensation is generally assessed and payable at the end of each calendar quarter. Such management and performance-based compensation is calculated after application of underlying manager fees and expenses. As described below, AAML provides services to Hedge Funds, that invest in other investment vehicles (“underlying funds”) whose managers (“underlying managers”) typically charge: (i) an asset-based fee (that generally is in the range of 1% to 2% annually) and (ii) a profits-based fee (that generally is approximately 20%), and in some cases higher rates, and which fee rates vary for each such underlying fund. Additionally, the fees of AAML do not include the expenses of any service providers hired by the Hedge Funds and/or any operating and overhead expense reimbursements paid to AAML and do not include expenses indirectly borne through investments in underlying funds or customized portfolios (e.g., redemption fees may be charged by certain hedge funds). Each Hedge Fund sets forth any such additional operational expenses in the relevant Governing Documents.

Factors AAML may consider in negotiating fees or other terms to which any investor may be subject may include, without limitation, the nature of the services required, the extent of reporting or other administrative services required, the type of assets invested, the amount of assets invested, AAML’s prior relationship with the applicable investor or its affiliates, other investments with AAML by the applicable investor or its affiliates, the other terms to which the investor’s investment with AAML would be subject and the impact such special terms might have on other investors.

Other Fees AAML may have different fee schedules for products and services offered in other jurisdictions outside of the U.S.

We examine fee ranges and average fees using comparative universes. Terms are negotiated on a case by case basis. In addition to the advisory fees discussed above, clients may incur additional fees related to the services we provide. Clients may incur the fees and expenses charged by the custodian of client assets managed by us, as well as brokerage and other transaction costs associated with securities trades that we order on behalf of the assets in a client account. We occasionally invest client assets in other products that we or an affiliate may also advise. Specifically, clients participating in Strategic Client Solutions mandates may be recommended ASI-managed products and/or other advisory services. As a shareholder of an ASI product or client of ASI advisory services, a client may be subject to advisory fees (and other expenses) at the product level or for other ASI advisory services in addition to fees charged to the advised account. For an additional discussion of brokerage and other transaction costs, please refer to Item 12 - Brokerage Practices of this Brochure. please register to get more info

We sometimes enter into agreements for performance-based fees with qualified clients. The existence of such a performance-based fee may create conflicts of interest in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities between different strategies. Additionally, collecting performance- based fees may result in instances in which a portfolio manager concurrently manages accounts with different fee structures for the same strategy. This is referred to as “side-by-side” portfolio management and, in these instances, we will not determine allocations based on whether we are participating in a trade or on the fee structure of the managed accounts participating in the trade. Furthermore, we may seed investment vehicles and make co-investments along with clients invested in property funds, direct property investments, or other private fund investments.

The potential management of different types of accounts and accounts with different fee arrangements (“side-by-side” management) may give rise to potential conflicts of interest. Registered funds, for example, generally pay management fees based on a fixed percentage of assets under management, while separate accounts and private funds potentially may have more varied fee structures, including performance-based incentives. Where performance is good, performance-based fee clients may be charged fees higher than the industry standard. We may have a material incentive to favor certain, more lucrative accounts over those that may be less lucrative. Additionally, we may have a material incentive to favor accounts in which we, or our affiliates, have significant proprietary interest. For example, we have an incentive to allocate better- performing securities to those accounts subject to performance fees rather than to those which are not. These performance fees may also incentivize the portfolio manager to take riskier positions than would have otherwise been initiated. Additionally, the calculation of performance fees is based upon a number of factors both within and out of our control. To mitigate these conflicts, we have adopted policies and procedures to ensure that investment decisions are made based in the best interests of our clients and without consideration of our financial interests.

To address such potential conflicts of interest, ASI has adopted procedures and policies designed to:
• Identify practices that may potentially favor actively managed accounts in which an Investment Manager has an ownership and/or a greater pecuniary interest over actively managed accounts in which the Investment Manager has no ownership and/or a lesser pecuniary interest;
• Prevent the Investment Manager and Covered Persons (as defined in ASI’s Code of conductCode of conduct, discussed below) from inappropriately favoring some clients over others;
• Detect potential violations of such policies and procedures;
• Provide a process to review requests for waivers; and
• Promptly resolve any actual violations detected.

ASI’s policies generally prohibit Portfolio Managers from trading in conflict with themselves – specifically, across same strategy accounts that they manage. Generally, Portfolio Managers are prohibited from taking an “inconsistent position”, or from holding the same security long in some accounts and short in others, unless they are materially underweight in a long only account that must hold that security at some level for benchmark tracking purposes (as this would not appear to represent a conflict of interest). Portfolio Managers may, however make different investment decisions for the same security or credit for different strategies they manage, as appropriate.

In the event that a potential conflict of interest is identified, the Department Head and the Compliance Department will discuss the conflict and take appropriate corrective action. Compliance will also review the procedures in such instances to ensure that they are appropriately crafted to identify similar future conflicts of interest. From time to time, ASI, its directors, officers, employees or affiliates (“affiliated persons”) may, directly or indirectly, have interests in securities owned by or recommended to our clients. As these situations may represent a potential conflict of interest, we have adopted a Code of conduct (“Code”) in compliance with the requirements of Rule 17j-1 adopted under the 1940 Act and Sections 204A and 206 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), to govern personal transactions by directors, officers, and advisory personnel of ASI (“Access Persons”). For further detail on ASI’s Code, please refer to please register to get more info

We also monitor for conflicts by implementing “best execution” trading procedures and reviewing account allocation and performance. AAML, or a related entity of AAML, as general partner of certain Private Equity Funds, Hedge Funds, or adviser to a separate account or investment advisory client, will typically receive certain allocations or fees calculated and charged based on a share of capital gains on or capital appreciation of the assets of the Hedge Fund, separate account client or investment advisory client. These performance-based allocation arrangements comply with Rule 205-3 under the Advisers Act. Any share of profits paid to AAML, one of its affiliates, or the general partners of the Hedge Funds, is separate and distinct from the advisory fees charged by AAML for advisory services. Performance-based allocation arrangements received by AAML or any of its related entities may create an incentive for AAML to recommend investments that may be riskier or more speculative than those that would be recommended under a different fee arrangement. In addition to Performance-Based fees paid to the Adviser, the Funds may cover operating and organizational expenses of the Adviser, as detailed in Item 5 above. Please refer to the Governing Documents of the applicable Private Fund or Hedge Fund (or the investment advisory agreement of the applicable separate account client) for complete information on the performance-based compensation arrangements entered into with respect to such client.

AAML may provide concurrent advisory services to client accounts that are not charged a performance- based fee or allocation by AAML’s related persons and client accounts that are charged a performance-based fee or allocation by a related person of AAML, AAAML or one of its affiliates may also provide concurrent advisory services to private equity funds, Hedge Funds, and/or separate account or investment advisory clients that are charged different performance-based fees or allocations and, in certain cases, AAML may only be permitted to take a performance-based fee or allocation from a private equity fund, Hedge Fund, or separate account client or investment advisory client after the applicable investors or client received a preferred return on their committed or contributed capital. Additionally, the General Partner may, in its discretion, agree to special terms regarding carried interest with respect to certain Partners including, without limitation, ASI employees, ASI affiliates, and certain Limited Partners with significant capital commitments to the Fund. As a result, the potential for AAML’s related persons to receive different fees or allocations from performance-based accounts creates a potential conflict of interest with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities because AAML may have an incentive to direct the best investment ideas to, or to allocate investments in favor of, the account that pays a more favorable performance fee or allocation.

To mitigate this potential conflict of interest, allocation of commitments and investment decisions with respect to investment opportunities are made by AAML or an affiliate for all private equity funds, Hedge Funds, and separate account and investment advisory clients in accordance with investment allocation policies. With respect to investment opportunities that are appropriate for more than one client (including a fund and/or a separate account or investment advisory client, ASI’s investment allocation policies takes into account multiple criteria, including (but not limited to) the investment objectives and strategies of each applicable client, differences with respect to the available capital, size, and remaining life of the applicable clients, differences in risk profile at the time the opportunity becomes available, potential conflicts of interest, the nature of the security or the transaction, and current and anticipated market conditions. In the event the investment opportunity is suitable for more than one client, will derive an allocation that, over a period of time, is fair and equitable to each applicable client relative to other clients, taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances. Prospective investors should refer to the Governing Documents of the Hedge Funds for more details on investment allocation decisions among the Hedge Funds.
Item 7 – Types of Clients
Clients Our client base comprises a variety of institutional clients, including corporate plans, non-profit organizations, public plans, governments, private investors, multi-employer plans, financial institutions, intermediaries, sub-advised funds and pooled investment vehicles, encompassing both affiliated and unaffiliated U.S. and non-U.S registered funds and U.S. and non-U.S. unregistered funds, among others. The requirements for opening any account will vary depending on the type of product and type of client. We have minimum account size requirements for certain accounts which may be waived at our discretion. Please refer to Item 5 of this Brochure for additional information on minimum account size requirements.

Privacy Policy We recognize and respect the privacy concerns of our customers. We are strongly committed to protecting the privacy of client information and will not disclose any non-public personal information about our customers or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law. In order to service your account and effect your transactions, we may provide your personal information to our affiliates and to financial service providers that assist us in servicing your account and have a need for such information, such as a broker- dealer, custodian or administrator. We may also provide client information to a third party in situations where clients have given us consent to do so, at the request of a regulator or where we are required to disclose the information by law or regulation. We require third-party service providers and financial institutions with which we have joint marketing arrangements to protect the confidentiality of your information and to use the information only for the purposes for which we disclose the information to them. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to guard your non-public personal information. We have adopted privacy policies and procedures that are designed to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and use of client non-public personal information.
Item 8 – Methods of Analysis, Investment Strategies and Risk of Loss
Methods of Analysis and Investment Strategies
We utilize various investment approaches when managing discretionary client accounts and providing recommendations to non-discretionary clients. We have described below the various methods of analysis and investment strategies, as well as the primary risks associated with the investment strategies. These include Equities, Fixed Income, Alternative Investments, and Real Estate.
Equities
As active equity investors, we believe that fundamental company research drives performance. We focus our global resources on gaining deep understanding of individual companies and the sectors they operate in, building high-conviction portfolios that give investors direct access to our best ideas. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations are core to our approach. By actively engaging with companies on ESG issues and fully integrating these insights into our stock research and decision making, we aim to enhance investor returns and reduce risk. We maintain a deep local presence across markets. Insight is shared and rigorously peer-reviewed, within and across teams, so only those we consider the strongest investment opportunities are included in client portfolios. Our disciplined research-driven approach is applied to meet distinct client goals – from ‘high active’ portfolios aiming to deliver long-term outperformance, to income strategies targeting a premium yield, and values-based strategies designed to meet specific ethical, socially responsible and impact-investing goals. Investment approaches We utilize two distinct investment approaches, Focus on Change and Long-Term Quality. These approaches lead to a number of different outcomes dependent on client need. These include high active, small cap, income, and values-led investing. The common threads amongst the two approaches are a belief in fundamental research leading to insights which help exploit market inefficiencies and the incorporation of understanding ESG risks in the process. Focus on Change Our Focus on Change investment approach seeks out under appreciated company and industry level fundamental change which creates opportunities over the medium term. We seek to identify positive and negative drivers of change which are underappreciated by the market, and focus on the most important drivers of the share price. We expect these non-consensus insights to play out over a 1-3 year investment horizon. This is a style agnostic approach, providing the opportunity to add value regardless of market phase. Long-Term Quality Our Long-term Quality investment approach seeks out mispricing opportunities where the market underappreciates company quality with a long-term horizon. We have a clear idea of quality, as evidenced by company management, strength of economic moat, management of financial and ESG risks, and assessment of business model. At its most basic, we seek high quality businesses trading at attractive valuations. Our quality investment approach results in investment in resilient companies with the aim to provide downside protection.
Fixed Income
Our investment teams seek to generate investment alpha within their specialist areas utilizing a foundation of fundamentally-driven research. Strategies are tailored to meet individual portfolio and client objectives and benefit from independent risk monitoring and oversight. Key points
• Active management, operating globally, aiming to deliver outperformance
• Using diversified sources of added value to improve risk-return profiles
• Specialist decision makers, working within allocated risk budgets.
• Collaborative research process with global perspective
• Strong derivatives capability for both active and liability management

Active management We give our client added value by exploiting market inefficiencies in interest rates, currency, investment grade credit, emerging market debt and high yield. We have dedicated portfolio managers and analysts in the United Kingdom & Europe, North America and Asia/Australia. They operate as close-knit teams, delegating investment decision-making to specialists, depending on their knowledge and expertise.

Flexible and disciplined investment process Our investment structure enables us not only to follow a disciplined investment process while allowing flexibility to manage portfolios for a wide variety of client requirements. This may range from strategies which employ multiple sources of uncorrelated returns to those that are focused on a particular specialist area.

Diverse solutions Fixed income is not a static area. Many clients are moving to higher performance or core plus mandates, with others moving away from market-based indices and the use of liability driven benchmarks. We aim to deliver superior performance across the full range of our fixed income capabilities. We also use derivatives, such as interest rate and credit default swaps, to add value and match liability exposures.
Alternative Investments


Alternative Investment Strategies (Hedge Funds)

We consider hedge fund strategies as a set of investment trading strategies that can offer potential diversification benefits for investors in traditional asset classes. Due to the potential non-traditional nature of hedge strategy returns, performance is not necessarily correlated with traditional investment markets or indices, such as equities or bonds. We believe that, through understanding the properties and behavior of different strategies; portfolios can be created that are not solely dependent on market direction for returns. Such investments can therefore be potentially diversifying for investors in traditional asset classes.

In constructing portfolios, we believe one of the key focuses should be the understanding, monitoring and management of risk. Risk exposures and market sensitivities must be appropriate to the longer-term investment objective. We also believe that value can be added through active portfolio management to reflect strategic and tactical views and opportunities. Throughout the investment process, we believe that the best outcomes are delivered by making team-based, high-conviction decisions. Our approach: We have a long track record of building multi-manager hedge fund portfolios. We do this through:
• Proprietary research and understanding prospective managers and their strategies well. This is how we understand the investment proposition and develop conviction in a manager’s ability to deliver on their stated investment strategy.
• Conduct proprietary style and strategy research to develop views on different strategies, their potential return characteristics and the underlying drivers of their future returns.
• Thoroughly investigate the non-investment risks associated with various investments, and do not invest if these risks are deemed too high regardless of the perceived strength of an investment proposition.
• Assess the collective risks in a portfolio of strategies and managers.
• Understand the overall exposures in your portfolios and ensure they reflect your investment views and the portfolio objectives. While individual investments may reflect appropriate risk exposures, the aggregated portfolio may not be appropriately weighted.
• Committee based approach to portfolio management and construction, led by the team’s Governance and Investment Committee.

We view alternative risk premia as an extension of traditional hedge fund strategies which can exist due to behavioural biases, investor constraints, mispricing of risk and differences in adoption of new information. The risk premia have been evidenced through detailed academic research but has also been captured for many years by both discretionary and systematic/quantitative hedge fund managers. Individual risk premia can be used as building blocks to achieve exposure to specific risk factors or combined to create cost effective, transparent and liquid solutions for investors looking for exposure to alternative sources of return. Investing in alternative risk premia requires considerable investment due diligence, risk management and well-resourced operational capabilities. Our philosophy can broadly be described by the following themes:


• Undertake proprietary research to fully understand the validity of a particular risk premia strategy before using it as a component of a portfolio.
• Through our proprietary style and strategy research develop views on different risk premia strategies, to ascertain their likely return characteristics and the underlying drivers of their future returns. This research also drives our understanding of how different risk premia strategies are likely to perform in different environments and scenarios.
• Thoroughly investigate operational/non-investment risks.
• Strategic Asset Allocation: follow a quantitative, risk-based portfolio construction process to form a long-term strategic asset allocation to risk premia strategies.
• Continuously assess investment related risks as we recognise these are both dynamic and multi- dimensional.

MultiAsset Investment

Our multi-asset experts are supported by over 1,000 asset class specialists around the world, maintaining deep and continuous insight into equities, fixed income, real estate and alternatives. Our collaborative team ethos ensures insight is fully and effectively shared so we can create outcome-focused portfolios comprising the most compelling opportunities we can find across markets and asset classes.

Our multi-asset solutions include:


• absolute return strategies that aim to deliver positive annualised returns regardless of market direction
• enhanced-diversification strategies that seek to generate equity-like returns over the medium term with less volatility than investing only in equities
• risk-based portfolios that are tailored to provide investors with an investment based on their preferred investment style and tolerance to risk
• traditional balanced portfolios that spread investment across a range of different asset classes
• liability-driven investment (LDI) strategies that aim to provide sufficient assets to meet all current and future liabilities
Quantitative Investment Strategies
Formed in 2005, the quantitative investments team manages a diverse range of products including passive, smart beta, and active quant strategies. It is a proprietary, rules-based approach. The team manage quantitative equity, fixed income and derivative portfolios across all markets. The investment process is grounded in academic research and investment theory. The team identifies sources of excess risk-adjusted returns, test them throughout the business cycle, and use them in their active quantitative portfolios in a systematic, cost-effective, and risk-controlled manner.

The quantitative investment strategies include:
• Traditional indexation – matching the returns of conventional benchmarks, such as the FTSE All- Share Index, that are weighted according to the market capitalisation of each company. The process used to do this is scalable, repeatable and risk-controlled.
• Enhanced indexation – aiming to generate returns slightly above those of the benchmark, by taking a similar level of risk. Taking an equity index as the starting point, our investment process models themes including value, prudent management, financial strength and others. For each of the themes, the team identify a strong investment rationale or established via back-testing that it is likely to outperform over a business cycle. The team then 'tilt' the portfolio to the identified theme(s), aiming to produce a consistent, risk-adjusted return.
• Smart beta (SMARTER Beta™) – combining the benefits of active and passive management in a new 'third approach' to investing. Smart beta techniques aim to achieve returns above that of the market, or risk levels below that of the market. They use 'risk premia' factors (similar to the enhanced index themes above) while retaining the numerous benefits of conventional indexing such as simplicity, objectivity, transparency and relatively low costs. The SMARTER Beta™ capability aims to achieve both higher returns and lower risk.
• Bespoke products – the team also manage a range of tailored derivative and structured products.

Strategic Client Solutions

The Strategic Client Solutions proposition is based on three core components:
• Client insight - to best help our clients, we need to fully understand their business, their portfolio and their challenges. The Strategic Clients Solutions team is a group of senior, seasoned investment professionals, all of whom have previous portfolio management and investment consulting experience. This means we can better empathise with clients’ challenges and apply this perspective to the creation of the most appropriate solutions.
• Simplifying complexity - as the investment landscape becomes increasingly complex, solutions need to be practical and intelligible. The exponential growth of technology, data and processing power has resulted in an explosion of information. We can help distinguish signal from noise.
• Harnessing the power of ASI - our firm has breadth and depth in investment capabilities. Given that the role of Strategic Client Solutions is predicated on providing knowledge and connectivity around the investment componentry within ASI and externally, our team has to have a deep understanding of the range of investment capabilities across the entire firm. We can help in connecting the relevant parts of the business and bringing together our knowledge, experience and expertise to best fit a client’s needs. Sometimes this will lead to a mandate for the Solutions team, but equally, it may sit with another ASI investment team – in which case, we will play a “clearing house” function, identifying which investment desk is best placed to respond to an opportunity and handing it off to them. Embedded alongside these three key features is the fact that our approach to delivering Strategic Client Solutions is very flexible. Some clients will need one-off advice on a particular issue, such as formulating a strategic asset allocation. Others will require ongoing engagement, such as tactical asset allocation recommendations or third-party manager selection and monitoring. Others may want to outsource part of the investment process entirely, in a customised multi-asset mandate. The flexible nature of our Solutions model combined with the breadth of capabilities across ASI allows us to respond to all of these needs.
Real Estate
Within real estate, our approach is founded on our beliefs:
• A dynamic approach to risk is key, allowing us to flex and adapt risk positions relevant to the appropriate risk budget for each client.
• A multi-asset real estate team offers a truly connected view of our asset class which benefits our clients.
• Environmental, social and governance factors (ESG) are critical in analysing the risks and opportunities which affect investment values in both the short and longer term.
• Understanding the global landscape and applying a globally consistent approach is critical.

We build our portfolios based on our stock picking skills within a market framework. For our clients we build high-conviction portfolios of quality assets to deliver specific outcomes: income, capital preservation, diversification or growth. We apply risk based tools which have a track record in assessing long term worth and relative prices. This medium and long term view is complemented by a measure of market momentum, which for some funds may be an important component of market timing and would allow the team to assess any liquidity opportunities or challenges in the market.

The critical first step in our investment process is to understand the objectives of our clients. Their risk tolerance, liquidity requirement, return expectations and size of allocation will formulate the target for investment. Dependant on the maturity of their scheme, or their investment horizon, clients may be more focused on income, capital preservation, or on diversification or a growth target. Once clearly defined, the next step in the process is to create and agree the risk budget of the allocation. The articulation of the risk budget will comprise clear and measureable tolerances in income profiles, portfolio structure, value creation, growth and any potential capital expenditure. These tolerances are reviewed annually in respect of their ongoing relevance to the client objective and the prevailing and expected market backdrop. In some cases these risk tolerances are written into fund documentation, or may require direct agreement with the client or, in other cases, are defined by the investment committee in accordance with the fund manager. The next stage in investment allocation process originates with the Houseview. The ASI Real Estate Houseview is multi-dimensional and dynamic. It is formed of short, medium and long term views of markets, sectors, risk and ESG thematics. It is the creation of the Real Estate Research and Strategy Team, working with their ESG colleagues and drawing on the local insights of the global fund management team. Collaboration with the wider ASI Research Institute as well as the Strategic Asset Allocation Team is also integral to the Houseview production. The Houseview is used as a framework for all funds and client objectives. For those clients seeking long term lower risk outcomes it provides a guide for those areas of the market capable of delivering the most durable income at the appropriate price. In value add and opportunistic strategies it indicates where the strongest growth opportunities are and where risk appears mis-priced. For diversified balanced mandates the Houseview acts as an asset allocation tool for portfolios, suggesting in which direction to tilt portfolios. The Houseview also illustrates opportunities for investing thematically, underpinned by proprietary research. At the core of the investment process is the Annual Strategic Plan. The plan details the fund’s strategic goals and action plans and is the key document for communicating fund strategy to all stakeholders. It is formulated by the Fund Manager with input from the Research, Strategy, Transactions, Treasury and Portfolio Management Teams. The Plan includes:
• the risk budget in line with client objectives, (or the fund documentation) and the portfolio metrics against the risk tolerances;
• a set of objectives for those open-ended funds where objectives will flex dependant on wider conditions and liquidity;
• the performance track record relative to objective and risk budget to include (where appropriate) portfolio to NAV breakdown;
• an outlook for the assets including a measure of near and medium future performance, plus a measure of current pricing against our measure of long term worth;
• the structure of the fund relative to Houseview (and where appropriate the benchmark);
• a cash management and debt strategy (where appropriate) ;
• detailed income and concentration risks;
• the portfolio constructed into quadrants: long term hold, asset manage short term hold, asset manage short term hold and short term hold;
• projected sales;
• target purchases;
• proposed capital expenditure;

Asset level underwriting and due diligence are a crucial ingredient to a fund’s Strategic Plan. The team based approach across ASI draws on the insight from the Transactions Team, ESG Specialists, Research Team and Fund Strategists. The aggregation of these views comes together in the cashflows run against all assets held and proposed for purchase. These cashflows underpin the short to medium term prospective performance contribution to the fund and also the long term worth of the assets. Over the short to medium term, the team are assessing the contributions to performance by running IRRs with reference to the Houseview rental and yield projections. In addition the team are assessing the long term worth of those assets based on an assessment of what the projected cashflow is worth by using ASI’s Asset Conviction Tool (ACT). Key inputs are the team based scores of the quality of the asset, the assessment of future changes in rental value and the resultant impact on the cash flow generated. ACT then applies a discount rate reflecting the team’s view of the inherent risk. The detailed due diligence, underwriting of assets within the portfolio and the guidance of the Houseview allow the fund teams to position and target positioning of investments within quadrants and creates a consistent language across all funds. It provides a simple and clear format for discussing strategy with clients and is a useful measure of successful asset management when compared over time. Between annual plans, each fund undertakes a review on a six monthly basis. However, more complex funds (open ended funds and funds in investment phase), those not delivering on action plans or those which have performance challenges, may be required to have more frequent reviews. The Investment Strategy Committee (ISC) would stipulate more frequent reviews where required. The reviews are a check and challenge on progress made towards strategic goals and planned actions. A measure of the risk profile of the fund is compared against the market backdrop and any changes in the risk environment, momentum or Houseview. Changing dynamics in the market environment or momentum could lead to an acceleration or postponement of key actions on the plan. The detail and the team input into the Strategic Plan is signed off by Investment Strategy Committee (ISC) on an annual basis. The benefit of approval at this level is that all target sales, purchases and capital expenditure are viewed in terms of their impact on the fund and hence the relevance to the client’s objectives. It is, however, important that acquisitions are approved individually on an ongoing basis through the year given the process above cannot mitigate specific risks.
Investment Strategy Risks

As with any investment, there is no guarantee that a portfolio will achieve its investment objective. Investing in securities involves risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear. However, clients should be aware that not all of the risks listed below will pertain to every account as certain risks may only apply to certain strategies. It is not possible to identify all of the risks associated with investing and the particular risks applicable to a client account will depend on the nature of the account, its investment strategy or strategies and the types of securities held. Given the volume of new rules and regulations in the industry, we are continuously reviewing the application of our risks. While we seek to manage accounts so that risks are appropriate to the strategy, it is often not possible or desirable to fully mitigate risks. Any investment includes the risk of loss and there can be no guarantee that a particular level of return will be achieved. Clients and other investors should understand that they could lose some or all of their investment and should be prepared to bear the risk of such potential losses. Clients and other investors should read carefully all applicable informational materials and offering/Governing Documents, including offering memorandums and prospectuses prior to retaining ASI to manage an account or investing in any ASI investment product. Clients and other investors should be aware that while ASI does not limit its advice to particular types of investments, mandates may be limited to certain types of securities or to the recommendation of investment advisers or managed funds, and may not be diversified. The accounts managed by ASI are generally not intended to provide a complete investment program for a client or investor. Clients and other investors are responsible for appropriately diversifying their assets to guard against the risk of loss.

Below is a summary of the material risks associated with our significant strategies and methods of analysis. Not all possible risks are described below.

Adjustable Rate Risk – Adjustable rate securities are securities that have interest rates that are reset at periodic intervals, usually by reference to some interest rate index or market interest rate. Some adjustable rate securities are backed by pools of mortgage loans. Although the rate adjustment feature may act as a buffer to reduce sharp changes in the value of adjustable rate securities, these securities are still subject to changes in value based on changes in market interest rates or changes in the issuer’s creditworthiness. Because the interest rate is reset only periodically, changes in the interest rates on adjustable rate securities may lag changes in prevailing market interest rates. Also, some adjustable rate securities (or, in the case of securities backed by mortgage loans, the underlying mortgages) are subject to caps or floors that limit the maximum change in interest rate during a specified period or over the life of the security. Because of the resetting of interest rates, adjustable rate securities are less likely than non-adjustable rate securities of comparable quality and maturity to increase significantly in value when market interest rates fall.

Allocation Risk – The allocation among different investment opportunities may have a significant effect on a portfolio’s value when one of these investments is performing more poorly than others. There will be transaction costs which may be significant over time because both the direct investments and derivative positions will be adjusted periodically to reflect our view of market and economic conditions. In addition, there is a risk that certain allocation decisions may not achieve the desired results and, consequently, a portfolio may incur losses.

Bank Loans – Bank loans include floating and fixed rate debt obligations. Floating rate loans are debt obligations issued by companies or other entities with floating interest rates that reset periodically. Floating rate loans are secured by specific collateral of the borrower and are senior to most other securities of the borrower (e.g., common stock or debt instruments) in the event of bankruptcy. Floating rate loans are often issued in connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and refinancing. Floating rate loans are typically structured and administered by a financial institution that acts as the agent of the lenders participating in the floating rate loan. Floating rate loans may be acquired directly through the agent, as an assignment from another lender who holds a direct interest in the floating rate loan, or as a participation interest in another lender’s portion of the floating rate loan.

Borrowing Risk – Borrowing creates leverage. The use of leverage may subject investments to additional risk and could magnify losses. It also adds to any given portfolio expenses, and at times could effectively force a portfolio to sell securities when it otherwise might not want to do so. Business Continuity Risk – We have adopted a business continuity plan to maintain critical functions in the event of a partial or total building outage affecting our offices or a technical problem affecting applications, data centers or networks. The plan is designed to limit the impact on clients from any business interruption or disaster, including those related to third party service providers. Nevertheless, our ability to conduct business may be curtailed by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our operations and the regions in which our offices are located. While ASI and its service providers have established business continuity plans in the event of, and risk management systems to prevent, such incidents, there are inherent limitations in such plans and systems, including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified. Cash Flow Risk – The yields available from equity investments in real estate depend in large part on the amount of income generated and expenses incurred. If the investments do not generate revenues sufficient to meet operating expenses, including debt service, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other capital expenditures, clients may be required to fund or borrow additional amounts to cover fixed costs, and the cash flow of such client account (and, with respect to investment funds, its ability to make distributions to shareholders) will be adversely affected. Although each client will be investing in a range of investments, all real estate investments are speculative in nature and the possibility of partial or total loss of capital exists. Collateralized Loan Obligations (“CLOs”) – CLOs are trusts or other special purpose entities that are backed by a pool of loans. Such loans may include domestic and foreign senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans and subordinate corporate loans, some of which may be below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans. CLOs issue classes or “tranches” that vary in risk and yield, and may experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, decrease of market value due to collateral defaults and disappearance of subordinate tranches, market anticipation of defaults, and investor aversion to CLO securities as a class. The risks of CLOs depend largely on the type of the underlying loans and the tranche of CLOs in which the client invests. In addition, CLOs carry risks including interest rate risk, credit risks and default risk. Certain CLOs may not hold loans directly, but rather, use derivatives such as swaps to create “synthetic” exposure to the collateral pool of loans.

Competitive Investment Environment – The activity of identifying, completing and realizing hedge fund real assets investments is highly competitive and involves a high degree of uncertainty. We may, at times, be in competition with other funds and managers with similar investment objectives for the acquisition of the same targets.

Conflicts of Interest – Due to the structure of AAML, it is possible that we may hold or trade the same securities and instruments as our underlying fund managers in which we invest. Additionally, we may utilize similar techniques and strategies as those adopted by our underlying fund managers. As a result, we may directly or indirectly compete with our underlying managers and investment vehicles on an “arm’s length” basis. In the event that knowledge of a conflict of interest does arise, we will endeavor to ensure that it is resolved fairly and at arm’s length.

Concentration Risk – The risk that if a portfolio concentrates its investments in issuers within the same country, state, industry or economic sector, an adverse economic, business or political development may affect the value of the portfolio’s investments more than if its investments were not so concentrated.

Convertible Bond Arbitrage – Underlying fund managers may engage in convertible bond arbitrage and the positions intended to offset one another may not move as expected. In addition to the risks associated with fixed income, these types of strategies have risks associated with equity investments. Although the underlying fund manager is expected to hedge all equity exposure, there can be no assurance that such exposures won’t exist or that such hedges will be effective.

Convertible Securities Risk – The value of a convertible security will vary based on the perceived value of the equity security underlying the convertible security. Convertible securities are frequently issued with a call feature that allows the issuer to choose when to redeem the security, which could result in the accounts being forced to redeem, convert, or sell the convertible security under circumstances unfavorable to the accounts. In addition, if the value of the equity security underlying the convertible security declines enough, the convertible security is more likely to be valued as a debt security and subject the accounts to the risks of debt securities as described herein. Counterparty Risk – A portfolio may be exposed to the credit risk of counterparties with which, or the brokers, dealers, custodians and exchanges through which, it deals in connection with the investment of its assets, whether engaged in exchange-traded or off-exchange transactions. Credit/Default Risk – An issuer or guarantor of a fixed income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives or other contract, may be unable or unwilling to make timely payments of interest or principal, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The issuer or guarantor may default, causing a loss of the full principal amount of a security. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. There is the possibility that the credit rating of a fixed income security may be downgraded after purchase, which may adversely affect the value of the security. Investments in fixed income securities with lower ratings tend to have a higher probability that an issuer will default or fail to meet its payment obligations. Credit Spread Risk – Changes in credit spreads will affect the value of financial instruments. Credit spreads represent the credit risk premiums required by market participants for a given credit quality. When credit spreads widen, the value of investments in fixed income securities tend to fall and this decrease in value may not be offset by higher income from new investments. Credit spreads can be driven by macroeconomic factors as well as issue specific factors.

Cross-Class Liabilities – If the investment vehicle held by an underlying manager offers multiple share classes, there is the potential that losses in a share class not held may have an adverse effect on its NAV.

Currency Hedging Risks – There can be no guarantee or assurance that any attempt to protect against adverse currency movements will be successful. As such, hedging transactions may result in a poorer overall performance and any realized loss resulting from these currency hedging strategies may also affect the level of redemptions required of our underlying managers. In extreme circumstances, this may result in the concentration of the underlying manager’s investments in less liquid or illiquid investments.

Currency Risk – Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may negatively affect the value of your portfolio’s investments or reduce its returns.

Cyber Security Risk – ASI, like all companies, may be susceptible to operational and information security risks. Breaches in cyber security include, among other behaviours, stealing or corrupting data maintained online or digitally, denial of service attacks on websites, the unauthorized release of confidential information or various other forms of cyber-attacks. Cyber security failures or breaches of ASI or its service providers or the issuers of securities in which ASI invest have the ability to cause disruptions and impact business operations, potentially resulting in financial losses, the inability of ASI’s clients to transact business, violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, and/or additional compliance costs. ASI and its clients could be negatively impacted as a result.

Debt Securities Risk – Debt securities in which an account may be invested may be unrated or lower-rated, and may have a risk profile closer to that of an equity security. Compared to other debt securities, those issues with the lowest investment-grade ratings (often called "junk bonds") are considered to have speculative characteristics. Debt securities that are below investment grade or unrated generally are considered predominately speculative with respect to the issuer's capacity to pay interest and repay principal according to the terms of the obligation and, therefore, carry greater investment risk, including the possibility of default and bankruptcy. They are likely to be less marketable and more adversely affected by economic downturns than high-quality debt securities. The accounts may invest in debt securities without considering the maturity of the instrument. Debt securities have varying levels of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. In general, the price of a debt security can fall when interest rates rise and can rise when interest rates fall. Securities with longer maturities can be more sensitive to interest rate changes. Therefore, changes in interest rates both in the U.S. and outside the U.S. may affect the accounts' debt investments unfavorably.

Depositary Receipts – Depositary receipts may be issued in a sponsored program, where an issuer has made arrangements to have its securities traded in the form of depositary receipts, or in an unsponsored program, where the issuer may not be directly involved. The holders of depositary receipts that are unsponsored generally bear various costs associated with the facilities, while a larger portion of the costs associated with sponsored depositary receipts are typically borne by the foreign issuers. Investments in unsponsored depositary receipts may be subject to the risks that the foreign issuer may not be obligated to cooperate with the U.S. depository, may not provide additional financial and other information to the depository or the investor, or that such information in the U.S. market may not be current. The depository of an unsponsored facility frequently is under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications received from the issuer of the deposited securities or to pass through the voting rights to facility holders with respect to the deposited securities. Available information concerning the issuers may not be as current for unsponsored depositary receipts and the prices of unsponsored depositary receipts may be more volatile than would be the case if the receipts were sponsored by the issuers. Derivatives Risk – Derivatives are financial instruments that have a value which depends upon, or is derived from, the value of something else, such as one or more underlying securities, pools of securities, options, futures, indexes or currencies. Derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses for your portfolio, and may be subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments. Because of their complex nature, some derivatives may not perform as intended. As a result, your portfolio may not realize the anticipated benefits from a derivative it holds or it may realize losses.

Gains or losses involving derivative instruments may be substantial, because a relatively small price movement in the underlying security(ies), instrument, currency or index may result in a substantial gain or loss. Derivatives will typically increase exposure to the principal risks to which a fund or client is otherwise exposed, and the following additional risks:
• Counterparty credit risk – A counterparty to the derivative instrument becomes bankrupt, insolvent, enters administration, liquidates or otherwise fails to perform its obligations due to financial difficulties, and the Fund may obtain no recovery of its investment or may only obtain a limited recovery, and any recovery may be delayed.
• Hedging risk – derivative instruments used to hedge against an opposite position may offset losses, but they may also offset gains.
• Correlation risk – There may be an incomplete correlation between the hedge and the opposite position, which may result in increased or unanticipated losses.
• Liquidity risk – An instrument may be difficult or impossible to sell or terminate, which may cause the client to be in a position to do something we would not otherwise choose, including accepting a lower price for the derivative instrument, selling other investments or forgoing another, more appealing investment opportunity.
• Leverage risk – Losses from the derivative instrument may be greater than the amount invested in the derivative instrument.

Deterioration of Market Conditions – In the case of extreme and continued market disruptions, attractive investment returns may be adversely affected. Continued market disruption or deterioration of market conditions and uncertainty could result in decreases in the market values of existing or potential investments. Additionally, liquidity may be affected, resulting in the inability to sell or liquidate investments at favorable times or prices. These circumstances may adversely impact the ability to meet investment objectives.

Dilution Levy Risk – Investment in underlying funds may subject the investor to dilution levies, which are fees charged by fund managers on investors buying and selling units in a fund. These fees may be applied at any combination of the purchase and sale of a unit and may have adverse effects on the returns of the investment.

Distressed Investments – Underlying fund managers may invest in securities and obligations of companies that are experiencing financial or business difficulties, including companies involved in bankruptcy or other reorganization and liquidation proceedings. These investments involve a substantial degree of risk and may not compensate investors adequately for the risks they assume. Due to the degree of complexity and unpredictability of bankruptcy and other insolvency proceedings, investors may be adversely affected. Due Diligence Process – The due diligence process that we intend to undertake may not reveal all material facts or circumstances. Any due diligence process involves subjective analysis and there can be no assurance that this process will reveal all issues related to the potential allocation of assets to underlying fund managers. Effect of Substantial Redemptions – Occasionally, investors may make large redemptions or purchases in fund, which may cause the fund to have to sell securities or invest additional cash. These transactions may adversely affect a fund’s performance and increase transaction costs. In addition, for fund of funds, redemptions by investors in the underlying funds held by a strategy within a short period of time may require the underlying fund manager to liquidate positions more rapidly than desired. This may lead to a reduction in value of the underlying funds’ assets or a disruption of the investment strategy. Additionally, this may lead to an increase in the concentration of the underlying funds in illiquid assets which could, in turn, reduce the liquidity of the shareholder’s position. Event Arbitrage – Arbitrage opportunities may exist in securities which are subject to tender offers, exchange offers, mergers, liquidations, reorganizations, bankruptcies or other extraordinary corporate transactions. Although it is expected that the underlying fund managers hedge such exposures, there can be no guarantee that these hedges will either be in place or be effective.

Emerging Markets Risk – Foreign investment risk may be particularly high if a portfolio invests in emerging market securities that are economically tied to countries with developing economies. These securities may present market, credit, currency, liquidity, legal, political and other risks different from, or greater than, the risks of investing in developed foreign countries.

Equity Securities Risk – Equity securities represent an ownership interest, or the right to acquire an ownership interest, in an issuer. Equity securities also include, among other things, preferred stocks, convertible stocks and warrants. The values of equity securities, such as common stocks and preferred stocks, may decline due to general market conditions which are not specifically related to a particular company, such as real or perceived adverse economic conditions, changes in the general outlook for corporate earnings, changes in interest or currency rates or adverse investor sentiment generally. They may also decline due to factors which affect a particular industry or industries, such as labor shortages or increased production costs and competitive conditions within an industry. Equity securities generally have greater price volatility than fixed income securities. Your portfolio at any point in time may be worth less than the amount that you invested, even after taking into account the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Regardless of how well an individual investment performs, if financial markets go down, you could lose money.

Focus Risk –A portfolio which invests a larger percentage of its assets in a relatively small number of issuers may be subject to greater risks than a more diversified account. That is, a change in the value of any single investment held by a portfolio may affect the overall value of the account more than it would affect an account that holds a greater number of investments.

Foreign (Non-U.S.) Risk – A portfolio’s investments in securities of non-U.S. issuers may involve more risk than those of U.S. issuers. The prices of these securities may fluctuate more widely and may be less liquid due to adverse market, economic, political, regulatory or other factors.

Forward Commitment Risk – When a portfolio engages in when-issued, delayed delivery or forward commitment transactions (e.g., “to be announced” securities or TBAs), the portfolio relies on the counterparty to consummate the sale. Failure to do so may result in the strategy missing the opportunity to obtain a price or yield considered to be advantageous. Such transactions may also have the effect of leverage on the strategy and may cause it to be more volatile. Additionally, these transactions may create a higher portfolio turnover rate. Forward Foreign Currency Contracts –We may into forward foreign currency contracts, which are types of derivative contracts whereby we may agree to buy or sell on behalf of a client a country’s currency at a specific price on a specific date, usually 30, 60, or 90 days in the future for a specific exchange rate on a given date. These contracts may, however, fall in value due to foreign market downswings or foreign currency value fluctuations. A fund or client may enter into forward foreign currency contracts for investment purposes, for risk management (hedging) purposes, and to increase flexibility, depending on the mandate. A fund’s or client’s investment of hedging strategies may be unable to achieve their objectives. These risks are in addition to the general “Derivatives Risks” described above. Futures Contracts – We may enter into futures contracts on behalf of client accounts, including currency, bond, commodity, index and interest rate futures, for investment purposes, for risk management (hedging) purposes, and to increase flexibility. The volatility of futures contracts prices has been historically greater than the volatility of stocks and bonds. The liquidity of the futures markets depends on participants entering into off-setting transactions rather than making or taking delivery. To the extent participants decide to make or take delivery, liquidity in the futures market could be reduced. In addition, futures exchanges often impose a maximum permissible price movement on each futures contract for each trading session. A client’s account may be disadvantaged if it is prohibited from executing a trade outside the daily permissible price movement. General Partner Risk – Governing Documents often limit the circumstances under which a general partner, manager and their affiliates can be held liable to a private fund. As a result, investors may have a more limited right of action in certain cases than they would otherwise have in the absence of this provision.

Growth Investing Risk – As a category, growth stocks may underperform value stocks (and the stock market as a whole) over any period of time. Because the prices of growth stocks are based largely on the expectation of future earnings, growth stock prices can decline rapidly and significantly in reaction to negative news about such factors as earnings, the economy, political developments, or other news.

High Yield Risk – Portfolios that invest in high yield securities, lower-rated or unrated securities, may be subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than accounts that do not invest in such securities. These securities are considered predominately speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to make principal and interest payments. An economic downturn or period of rising interest rates could adversely affect the market for these securities and lead to liquidity risk. If the issuer of a security is in default with respect to interest or principal payments, an account may lose its entire investment.

Inflation-Indexed Bond Risk – Any rise in interest rates may cause inflation-indexed bonds to decline in price, hurting the portfolio’s performance. If interest rates rise owing to reasons other than inflation, the portfolio’s investment in these securities may not be fully protected from the effects of rising interest rates. The performance of any bonds that are indexed to non-U.S. rates of inflation may be higher or lower than those indexed to U.S. inflation rates. A portfolio’s actual returns could fail to match the real rate of inflation.

Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) Risk – Prices of securities bought in an IPO may rise and fall rapidly, often because of investor perceptions rather than economic reasons.

Insurance Risk – When owning or managing properties, there are additional risks that might not present themselves as compared to traditional asset classes. While the properties may in some cases be insured, this is no way an insurance of investment or principal and there are various uninsured and/or uninsurable risks that are present (such as natural disaster) and therefore investment carries greater risk of loss.

Inside Information – From time to time, we may come into possession of material, non-public information concerning an entity in which an account has invested, or proposes to invest. Possession of that information may limit our ability to buy or sell securities of the entity on behalf of a client. Interest Rate Risk – Changes in interest rates will affect the value of a portfolio’s investments in fixed income securities. When interest rates rise, the value of investments in fixed income securities tend to fall, and this decrease in value may not be offset by higher income from new investments. Interest rate risk is generally greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities or durations. Inverse Floating Rate Securities Risk – The interest payment received on inverse floating rate securities “inverse floaters”) generally will decrease when short-term interest rates increase. Inverse floaters are derivatives that involve leverage and could magnify a client’s gains or losses. Investment Company and Exchange-Traded Fund (“ETF”) Risk – An investment in an investment company or ETF involves substantially the same risks as investing directly in the underlying securities. An investment company or ETF may not achieve its investment objective or execute its investment strategy effectively, which may adversely affect your portfolio’s performance. A portfolio must pay its pro-rata portion of an investment company’s or ETF’s fees and expenses. Shares of a closed-end investment company or ETF may trade at a premium or discount to the net asset value of its portfolio securities. Issuer Risk – The value of a security may decline for a number of reasons which directly relate to the issuer, such as management performance, financial leverage and reduced demand for the issuer’s goods or services, as well as the historical and prospective earnings of the issuer and the value of its assets.

Key Person Risk – Underlying funds are generally reliant on certain key investment personnel employed in managing assets. Termination, disability, death, or departure of key personnel could adversely affect the underlying fund and its performance.

Legal, Tax, and Regulatory Risk – Legal, tax and regulatory changes may occur in the future that may adversely affect investors. The effects of any future regulatory change are impossible to predict and could have substantial adverse effects on both investors and investment strategies.

Limited Capacity Opportunities – We manage assets for multiple portfolios that may from time to time have overlapping investment mandates. Where an investment opportunity is of limited capacity, an allocation process will need to ensure each of the competing accounts is treated equitably over time in determing whether an account may participate and to what extent.

Limited Operating History – At times, as we launch new strategies, certain of our investment teams may have a limited operating history and little or no past performance in the strategy they manage.

Limits on Hedged Strategies – While certain underlying managers, in whose funds our funds of funds may invest, may use “market neutral” or “relative value” hedging or arbitrage strategies, this in no respect should be taken to imply that the fund’s investments with such money underlying managers are without risk. Substantial losses may be recognized on “hedge’ or “arbitrage” positions, and illiquidity and/or default on one side of a position can effectively result in the position being changed. Every market neutral or relative value strategy involves exposure to some second order risk of the market, such as the implied volatility in convertible bonds or warrant, the yield spread between similar term government bonds, or the price spread between different classes of stock for the same underlying firm. Further, many “market neutral” investment managers employ limited directional strategies that expose such money managers to certain market risk.

Liquidity Risk – In certain situations, it may be difficult or impossible to sell an investment in an orderly fashion at an acceptable price. This includes investors in funds that may lock them up, possibly for multiple years. Investors in such funds must be able to bear the risk of investment for an extended period of time.

Managed Futures Strategy/Commodities Risk – Exposure to the commodities markets (including financial futures markets) through investment in managed futures programs may cause greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. Prices of commodities and related contracts may fluctuate significantly over short periods for a variety of reasons, including changes in interest rates, supply and demand relationships and balances of payments and trade; weather and natural disasters; and governmental, agricultural, trade, fiscal, monetary and exchange control programs and policies. The commodity markets are subject to temporary distortions and other disruptions. U.S. futures exchanges and some foreign exchanges have regulations that limit the amount of fluctuation in futures contract prices which may occur during a single business day. Limit prices have the effect of precluding trading in a particular contract or forcing the liquidation of contracts at disadvantageous times or prices. Management Risk – We will apply our investment techniques and risk analyses in making investment decisions for your portfolio, but there is no guarantee that our techniques will produce the intended results. For research or investment techniques that incorporate or rely upon quantitative models, there is no guarantee that these mathematical models will generate accurate forecasts, reduce risks or otherwise produce the intended results. Market Capitalization Risk (Small-, Mid- and Large-Cap Stocks Risk) – To the extent an investment emphasizes small-, mid-, or large-cap stocks, it takes on the associated risks. At any given time, any of these market capitalizations may be out of favor with investors. Compared to small- and mid-cap companies, large-cap companies may be less responsive to changes and opportunities, but their returns have sometimes led those of smaller companies, often with lower volatility. The stocks of small- and mid-cap companies may fluctuate more widely in price than the market as a whole, may be difficult to sell when the economy is not robust or during market downturns, and may be more affected than other types of stocks by the underperformance of a sector or during market downturns. In addition, compared to large-cap companies, small- and mid-cap companies may depend on a mo please register to get more info

Broker-Dealer Selection and Best Execution We have established policies and procedures designed to assess and monitor the broker-dealers selected to execute client transactions. We do not adhere to a rigid formula in making the selection of a broker-dealer for portfolio transactions, but rather weigh a combination of certain factors. When selecting a broker-dealer for client transactions, we take all sufficient steps to obtain the best possible outcome by looking at price, transaction costs, reasonableness of commissions, speed, efficiency, knowledge of particular securities, likelihood of execution and settlement, size and type of transaction, settlement capabilities, reputation, nature and any other consideration relevant to the best execution of that order. In selecting broker-dealers and in effecting portfolio transactions we seek to obtain best execution. Steps associated with seeking best execution are: (1) determining each client’s trading requirements; (2) selecting appropriate trading methods, venues, and agents to execute the trades under the circumstances; (3) evaluating market liquidity of each security and taking appropriate steps to avoid excessive market impact; (4) maintaining client confidentiality and proprietary information inherent in the decision to trade; and (5) reviewing the results on a periodic basis. We review the above criteria on an ongoing basis. We do not consider the sales of shares of investment companies it advises as a factor in the selection of broker-dealers to execute portfolio transactions for a fund.

When selecting or recommending for client transactions, a broker or service provider, we will consider, among other things, the following:


• Professional reputation;
• Ability to provide clear, impartial and expert advice;
• Understanding of and presence in the relevant market; and
• Potential for or actual conflicts of interest.

If a client requires preauthorization of trades, such trades may not be commingled or “batched” for purposes of execution with orders for the same securities for other accounts we manage. Therefore, such trades may be executed subsequent to the trades executed for other accounts we manage and at different prices and commission rates which may be better or worse than the rates received for batched trades.

We may use Electronic Communications Networks (“ECN”) or Alternative Trading Systems (“ATS”) to execute when, in our judgment, the use of an ECN or ATS may result in equal or more favorable overall executions for the transactions.

With regards to our Alternatives products, we do not arrange trades with any broker or dealer; our fund of hedge funds does not typically use brokers to transact for funds or third party clients as the investments made for such clients are generally in open-ended investment funds engaged in a continuous offering. The advice and investment activity conducted with regards to property funds generally relates to privately offered securities in partnerships or similar relevant structures that invest in real estate or real estate-related assets. We may invest in property funds which are marketed to AAML by placement agents; either the fund or the third-party manager bears the associated placement agent fees. Occasionally, we may recommend the purchase of a secondary interest in a privately offered security being offered by a broker. In such cases, clients may be required to pay a fee to the broker offering the interest on behalf of a seller. We do not receive client referrals from broker-dealers or third parties. For fund of fund products, investments in open-ended investment funds are facilitated through the appropriate transfer agent.

On occasion, our hedge funds client portfolios may receive security positions as part of a distribution or liquidation of an underlying fund or special purpose fund. While we generally execute transactions in these securities through the same broker-dealer where the ASI fund’s account was established, there are no limitations on which broker-dealers may be used or the commission rates or similar charges paid. With respect to non-discretionary model delivery accounts (including UMA accounts), we will deliver model changes subsequent to commencing trading on behalf of our discretionary accounts. Model changes are typically delivered on a security by security basis. The timing of such delivery is determined by AAML and will depend on the anticipated market impact of trading. Market impact includes, but is not limited to, factors such as liquidity and price impact. When minimal market impact is anticipated, we typically deliver security level model changes after such time when approximately two-thirds of our full discretionary order has been executed. Although we anticipate delivering model changes of such securities after approximately two-thirds of the discretionary order has been executed, we may deliver model changes prior to or substantially after two-thirds have been executed depending on prevailing market conditions and trader discretion. With respect to securities for which we anticipate a more significant market impact, we intend to withhold model delivery changes until such time when the entire discretionary order has been fully executed. Anticipated market impact on any given security is determined at the sole discretion of AAML based on prior market experience and current market conditions. Actual market impact may vary significantly from anticipated market impact. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, we may provide order instructions simultaneously or prior to completion of trading for other accounts if the trade represents a relatively small proportion of the average daily trading volume of the particular security or other instrument.

ASI does not trade for non-discretionary model delivery clients. Because model changes may be delivered to non-discretionary model clients prior to the completion of ASI’s discretionary account trading, ASI may compete against these clients in the market when attempting to execute its orders for its discretionary accounts. As a result, our discretionary clients may experience negative price and liquidity impact due to multiple market participants attempting to trade in a similar direction on the same security.

Timing delays or other operational factors associated with the implementation of trades may result in non- discretionary and model delivery clients receiving materially different prices relative to other client accounts. This may create performance dispersions within accounts with the same or similar investment mandate.

Commission Rates We seek to minimize the expenses incurred for effecting portfolio transactions to the extent consistent with the interests and policies of our clients. However, we will not select broker-dealers solely on the basis of “posted” commission rates. We will not always seek in advance competitive bidding for the most favorable commission rate applicable to any particular portfolio transaction. Although we generally seek competitive commission rates, we will not necessarily pay the lowest commission. Transactions may involve specialized services on the part of the broker-dealer involved, resulting in higher commissions.

The reasonableness of commissions is based on the broker-dealer’s ability to provide best execution.

Fixed income trades are placed based on best price and execution as determined by our review of solicited bids/offers. We may contact several companies in soliciting any bid/offer. Potential avenues of execution are placed in competition with one another to the extent reasonably possible whenever the portfolio managers look to buy or sell a bond. One of our measures of achieving best execution is executing a transaction with a qualified and capable counterparty that bids or offers the most favorable price under the circumstances. When buying or selling fixed income securities in dealer markets, we may prefer to deal directly with market-makers in the securities. We will typically affect these trades on a net basis, and will not pay the market-maker any commission, commission-equivalent or markup/markdown other than the “spread.” A “spread” is the difference between the price paid (or received) by our firm and the price received (or paid) by the market-maker in trades with other broker-dealers or other customers. Brokers through whom we execute trades may receive compensation from exchanges, market-makers and other intermediaries related to orders routed by the broker to those intermediaries. In appointing a broker or service provider for client transactions, we will consider the proposed level of fee given, among other things:
• The scope of activities to be undertaken in relation to the client transaction;
• Local market rates for the activities to be undertaken in relation to the client transaction; and
• The ability to deliver the transaction in a timely fashion and in the best interest of the client. Research On September 12, 2017, ASI announced a change to the payment for research model, such that ASI will absorb all research costs directly (i.e., pays for research from its profits and losses) to coincide with the new MiFID II legislation which went into effect on January 3, 2018. As a result, ASI has been “execution only” since the start of 2017, paying for research for equities out of its assets and paying down some residual CSA balances throughout 2017. While our policy is to seek best execution, we may select a broker for a portion of our trades which charges higher transaction costs if we determine in good faith that the cost is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage services provided. Despite these potential conflicts, we believe that we are able to negotiate costs on client transactions that are competitive and consistent with our policy to seek best execution. In addition, we do not enter into agreements or understandings with any brokers regarding the placement of securities transactions because of the research they provide. However, we do have an internal procedure for allocating transactions in a manner consistent with our execution policy to brokers that we have identified as providing superior executions and research of particular benefit to clients.

Brokerage for Client Referrals We may use solicitation agreements. We do not consider, in selecting or recommending broker-dealers, whether we or an affiliate have a relationship with a broker-dealer or third party, or whether we or an affiliate receive client referrals from a broker-dealer or third party. A client may direct us to use the services of a particular broker-dealer in executing transactions for that client’s account. In some cases, the directed broker may have recommended our firm as a manager for that account. As stated previously, it is possible that such an account may suffer adverse effects from this direction, depending on market conditions.

Directed Brokerage We do not routinely recommend, request or require that any client execute transactions through any specific broker or service provider. However, we occasionally receive requests from clients to direct a portion or all of the commissions earned on their account through a specific broker-dealer in order to generate a benefit for the client under such terms and arrangements as the client may negotiate with the particular broker or dealer. Where a client has directed the use of a particular broker-dealer, we may not be in a position to freely negotiate commission rates or spreads, to obtain volume discounts, or to select broker-dealers on the basis of best execution. In situations where the client has directed us to direct trades to a select broker, the client must forfeit best execution and should understand that we will enter into such arrangements on a “best efforts” basis. If a client directs us to use a particular broker-dealer for a transaction, it will not be commingled or “batched” for purposes of execution with orders for the same securities for other accounts we manage. Client-directed transactions may result in higher commissions, greater spreads, or less favorable net prices than might be the case if we were empowered to freely negotiate commission rates or spreads, or to select broker-dealers on the basis of best execution. It is AAML’s policy to accept these requests only under certain circumstances.

With regard to the hedge funds in which clients invest, securities are generally purchased directly from the issuer or general partner, without the assistance of a broker‐dealer and without the payment of a brokerage commission. With regard to securities distributed from the underlying funds in which ASI clients invest, ASI has discretion to select a broker‐dealer to effect securities transactions. In selecting broker‐dealers to effect securities transactions, ASI seeks to obtain best execution by considering factors including, but not limited to, execution quality, price, the level of service offered, reliability, experience in liquidating distributions from hedge funds and other such factors as ASI deems relevant and beneficial to the applicable ASI clients. Broker‐dealers utilized by ASI are reviewed on an ongoing basis. We may have certain accounts that were referred to us through the recommendation of third parties, including consultants that may also be broker-dealers, or may have certain pre-existing financial arrangements or relationships with a particular broker-dealer. Clients obtained from these third parties may instruct us to direct some or all of their brokerage transactions to the third party’s broker-dealers, or we may otherwise allocate brokerage to these or related broker-dealers. As stated previously, in situations where the client has directed us to direct trades to a particular broker, the client must forfeit best execution and should understand that we will only enter into such arrangements on a “best efforts” basis. We may also buy from such third parties certain services or products used in our investment advisory business (such as software or research publications) or pay registration or other fees toward or otherwise assist in sponsoring such third parties’ industry forums, seminars or conferences. We do not use client commissions to pay for these services. Trade Errors and Corrections In the event that we cause a trade error, our policy states that we ensure that the error is resolved in the best interests of the client. This means that trades are adjusted as needed in order to put the client account in such a position as if the error had never occurred. We review all trade errors to ensure they are resolved timely and accurately and that they do not indicate a recurrent pattern. In correcting trade errors, we or the party responsible for the error will bear the cost of correcting the error. Trade errors resulting in losses to client accounts will be reversed and the account compensated accordingly. To the extent a trade error in a client account results in a gain, we allow the client to keep the benefit, unless the gain offsets a loss in connection with a single transaction or occurrence or a series of related transactions, in which case any such gains and losses are netted unless prohibited by applicable regulation or a specific agreement with the client. In general, compensation is expected to be limited to direct monetary losses and will not include any amounts that AAML deems to be speculative or uncertain, nor will it cover investment losses not caused by the error.

Sub-advisers are responsible for their own execution of trades, and are therefore not covered under ASI’s Trade Error Policy. Sub-advisers are, however, expected to have sufficient policies and procedures with regards to trade error management that are in line with ASI’s policy. AAML will, when appropriate, review sub-adviser trade error policies and procedures and periodically review with the sub-advisers whether any trade errors were resolved in conformity with policies and procedures disclosed to the Adviser.

Cross-Trades We may cross-trade between and among certain client accounts in accordance with our written cross-trading procedures. We will only consider engaging in cross-transactions to the extent permitted by applicable law and will, to the extent required by law, obtain the necessary client consents. Clients may revoke their consent for agency cross-transactions at any time.

For fund of fund products, we may arrange for a transaction between two or more of the Funds, in which one Fund buys an interest in an underlying fund or other investment from, or sells such investment to, another Fund managed by ASI. Each of these cross transactions is affected at “fair value,” which is generally the Net Asset Value of the underlying fund. ASI receives no compensation (other than its management fee and incentive fee), directly or indirectly, for effecting a particular cross transaction. Although ASI will receive no compensation for cross transactions, underlying funds may assess customary transfer fees or commissions in connection with any such cross transaction. Cross transactions may inure to the benefit of the selling and buying Funds. Avoidance of redemption fees, taking on aged positions with the avoidance of soft and hard lock-ups, and the preservation of high water marks, are examples of other value added benefits that can inure to the benefit of the buying or selling Funds when applicable.

When a potential cross transaction involves a Fund or account that has a significant beneficial ownership by ASI or its affiliates and control persons, it will be considered whether this transaction should be treated as a principal transaction under ASI’s procedures (and separate criteria would apply), rather than as a cross transaction. Under ASI’s procedures, cross transactions are not permitted from or to any Fund or other account deemed to comprise “plan assets” pursuant to regulations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, or to or from a Registered Fund, without consideration of additional regulatory restrictions or approvals that are required by applicable law. Foreign Exchange (“FX”) Transactions We may execute currency transactions on an active basis through our currency trading desk, except where market restrictions in some emerging currencies exist and execution for trade settlement is arranged by the custodian directly. In addition, certain of our asset management clients may direct their currency trades to their custodian banks for execution via standing instructions, and in such cases as well as in the case of restricted emerging currencies, we may not know the precise execution time of the FX trade and cannot influence the exchange rates applied to these trades. Aggregation and Allocation We may, to the extent appropriate, permissible and/or feasible, aggregate multiple client orders for the purchase or sale of the same security to achieve best execution. In the instance that the same security is bought or sold for a number of clients at approximately the same time, orders may also be aggregated. Due to the possibility of a price variation among executed transactions throughout the trading period, an “averaging” procedure is utilized, when possible. This procedure allocates securities to those clients participating in the order on a pro-rata basis (subject to rounding) at the average execution price of the purchases and sales attributable to a given block, unless otherwise directed by the client or deemed inappropriate for best execution. If pro-rata allocations are deemed inappropriate, we may implement either rotational or random allocations, provided the result is fair access over time to trading opportunities for all eligible accounts.

In the instance that an order is not completed on the same trading day, the partial fill will be allocated pro- rata among participating clients, unless otherwise directed or deemed inappropriate for best execution. Any unexecuted orders will continue until either the block order is complete or all component orders have been cancelled. If remaining positions are too small to satisfy the minimum order amount, we may decide to allocate the remaining shares to those accounts which did meet the minimum. We may also decide to allocate remaining shares to those accounts for which orders would be completed as a result of the allocation.

We seek to allocate opportunities to all clients in a consistent, fair manner. In accordance with our written policies and procedures, we may take special considerations when deciding on allocations, provided they are deemed fair and equitable to all clients. These special considerations may include–but are not limited to–cash flow changes; specialized investment objectives or restrictions of a particular client; specific bond trades; directed brokerage; limit orders; market restrictions; lot size; open bulk orders (market-to-market); new portfolio fundings; fungibility of certain security types; or new issuance allocations (debt or equity). Allocations may also take into consideration factors such as the particular market restrictions, size, nature, identity, or number of positions in a client’s portfolio, concentration and size of holdings, industry and sector exposure, purchase cost and cash availability, ability to obtain meaningful position sizes, liquidity, investment imbalances, prior participation in similar opportunities, limitations on the availability of an investment, special needs, trading considerations, whether the allocation would result in an account receiving an amount lower than the typical transaction size or an “odd lot”; and other factors. In addition, AAML may exclude certain accounts from an allocation if the size of the allocation would not satisfy certain minimum size thresholds established by AAML, a client, or by the issuer itself for operational reasons.

We engage in real estate asset and investment management activities for a limited number of institutional and market counterparty clients; this creates the potential for a conflict of interest when allocating deals between clients. In order to manage any such conflict, we operate a deal introduction and allocation procedure which is intended to fulfill a number of criteria:


• Providing a practical, consistent and efficient method of deal introduction and deals allocation;
• Ensuring consistent fair and equal treatment of clients in deal introduction and deals allocation;
• Ensuring compliance generally and with any specific requirement in Asset Management or Investment Management Agreements in connection with deal introduction and deals allocation; and
• Providing a transparent and auditable control for deal introduction and deals allocation.

Representing several investors typically works to the benefit of all, as target fund terms can be negotiated more forcefully. Conflicts between different mandates could arise if there were a limited number of units available in a specific fund and where different clients have the similar investing preferences at the same time. If this scenario arises, we would run a fully transparent process where we would inform the clients about the situation. We would then offer to split the available units between the different parties, on a pro rata (to their individual applications) basis. We may make co-investments along with clients in property funds or direct property. When undertaking investment management activities for clients, the duty owed to that client shall prevail over any owed to ASI, to its managers, employees or any other person directly or indirectly linked to ASI by control or to any other third party, including any other client. Inevitably, not all clients, including clients with similar investment strategies, can participate in every investment opportunity, and clients who do participate in an investment cannot always participate to the same degree. AAML may determine that a limited supply of a particular opportunity or investment or other factors noted above may preclude the participation of some clients in a particular investment opportunity or trade. Similarly, when AAML determines to exit a position for some clients, other clients may not always participate, may not participate at the same time, or may not participate to an equal degree. Where transactions for an account are not aggregated with other orders, including directed brokerage accounts, or not netted against orders for the account or other accounts, the account may not benefit from a better price, lower commission rate, or lower transaction cost. Aggregation and netting of trades may disproportionately benefit some accounts relative to other accounts due to the relative amount of savings obtained.

ASI does not typically aggregate orders for its hedge fund clients. For such clients we seek to allocate transactions and opportunities among the various accounts in a manner we believe to be as equitable as possible over time, considering each account’s objectives, programs, limitations and capital available for investment. Any potential conflicts are brought to the attention of ASI’s Hedge Fund Investment Committee in order to resolve them in an equitable and fair fashion. We apply the same general principles equally to decisions on which underlying funds or managers would be suitable to be recommended for non- discretionary advisory clients as for making decisions to invest for discretionary clients. However, since ASI does not have discretion over allocation decisions in non-discretionary accounts, it is likely that the actual allocations will differ as between discretionary and non-discretionary accounts. In addition, there may be situations where we provide non-discretionary advice concerning an underlying fund or manager where there is no discretionary account for which the underlying fund or manager is suitable (or where there is no cash available in the discretionary account to make an investment) or vice versa. There may also be situations where ASI advises a non-discretionary client not to invest in an underlying fund or manager, but in which ASI does make an investment for its discretionary accounts. Finally, there may be situations where an advisory client sources an underlying fund or manager and asks for ASI’s advice, and even if ASI provides a favorable opinion on that underlying fund or manager, ASI may not invest in an underlying fund or manager for a variety of reasons. The results of any of these scenarios could, and it should be expected will, reasonably result in a divergence in performance between and among the various accounts over which ASI acts with discretion and for which ASI provides non-discretionary advice. In order to avoid conflicts arising from limited capacity available for investment in or with an underlying fund or manager that is identified as suitable for investment by both an advisory client and by ASI for its discretionary accounts, ASI will apply procedures that are designed to create a fair result under the circumstances. please register to get more info

Account Review Process We strive to ensure compliance with a client’s investment guidelines consistent with our fiduciary responsibility to manage an account in the best interest of our clients, and we aim to complete reviews on an ongoing and continuous basis. An account may be reviewed immediately to the extent that information concerning economic or market conditions, individual companies or industries could affect the account. Reviews of accounts also occur when investment strategies and objectives are changed by a client. Our relationship managers work closely with the fund management teams to ensure that each client’s guidelines are implemented, where applicable. Depending on the asset class and account type, we employ various methods of pre- and/or post-trade controls and monitoring techniques through automated or manual procedures to ensure that portfolios are managed in accordance with client-specific guidelines or restrictions as well as applicable regulatory requirements and internal policies. Periodic reviews may also be undertaken to ensure compliance with client investment guidelines. We have policies and procedures in place to address any investment guideline breaches. Reports to Clients We provide each client with written monthly or quarterly market and investment reports, which include cash balance, transaction records, position reports and account valuation. Additional reports may be provided upon a client’s request. please register to get more info

AAML may effect transactions with broker-dealers that furnish non-research services which we believe will be beneficial. In no event will we compensate a third-party solicitor for a referral if that solicitor serves as a sponsor, decision-maker or fiduciary of any U.S. pension or profit-sharing plan. We may engage and compensate entities to provide prime brokerage and other services (including client account statement preparation) to client accounts.

In addition, other third parties may provide certain shareholder servicing and/or distribution support services in connection with the sale of shares of our mutual funds or other funds that we service. These third parties may do so either directly or through intermediaries (i.e., broker-dealers) and may, in some instances, refer clients into such funds. These third parties (and the intermediaries through whom the funds are available) may receive cash compensation for these services out of our own resources. Our firm, or our affiliates, may be compensated in connection with the sale of shares of either our mutual funds or other funds that either entity services. In addition, our sales and client service employees’ compensation may be linked to sales goals relating to the sale of our mutual funds. please register to get more info

We do not act as a custodian for client assets. Clients typically receive statements from their account custodians at least quarterly and are encouraged to compare statements received from us with statements received from their client account custodians. Clients should carefully review their custodian statements to ensure they reflect the appropriate activity in their account. If there are differences between a client’s custodian statement and an Aberdeen account statement, or if a client has not received their account custodian statement, clients are asked to contact their client service representative. please register to get more info

Depending upon the terms of an investment management agreement entered into with each client, we may have discretionary authority to make the following determinations without client consultation or consent prior to effecting each transaction:
• the securities that are to be bought or sold;
• the total amount of the securities to be bought or sold;
• the broker-dealer through whom securities are to be bought or sold; and
• the commission rates at which securities transactions for client accounts are effected. We exercise discretion in a manner consistent with the stated investment objectives for a particular client account. We may accept advisory accounts with limited discretion or where investments are client-directed pursuant to an investment management agreement. We may also be limited in the type or quantity of securities purchased or held due to certain regulatory or internal compliance restrictions. Client investment guidelines and restrictions must be provided to us in writing. Unless ASI and a client have entered into a non-discretionary arrangement, ASI generally is not required to provide notice to, consult with, or seek the consent of its clients prior to engaging in transactions. Please refer to Item 4 of this Brochure for additional information on clients’ ability to tailor investment guidelines. please register to get more info

Where clients appoint AAML to vote proxies on their behalf. Policies have been established to vote these proxies in the best interests of our clients. We employ ISS as a service provider to deliver our voting decisions efficiently to companies. We require ISS to provide recommendations based on our own set of parameters to tailored ASI’s assessment and approach, but remain conscious that all voting decisions are our own on behalf of our clients. We consider ISS’s recommendations and those based on our custom parameters as input to our voting decisions.

An ASI analyst will assess the resolutions at general meetings in our active investment portfolios. This analysis will be based on our knowledge of the company, but will also make use of the custom and standard recommendations provided by ISS as described above. The product of this analysis will be final voting decision instructed through ISS applied to all funds and clients for which ASI have been appointed to vote For funds managed by a sub-adviser, we may delegate to the sub-adviser the authority to vote proxies; however, the sub-adviser will be required to either follow our policies and procedures or to demonstrate that their policies and procedures are consistent with ours, or otherwise implemented in the best interest of clients.

There may be certain circumstances where AAML may take a more limited role in voting proxies. We will not vote proxies for client accounts in which the client contract specifies that AAML will not vote. We may abstain from voting a client proxy if the voting is uneconomic or otherwise not in clients’ best interests. For companies held only in passively managed portfolios AAML custom recommendations provided by ISS will be used to automatically apply our voting approach; we have scope to intervene to test that this delivers appropriate results, and will on occasions intrude to apply a vote more fully in clients’ best interests. If voting securities are part of a securities lending program, we may be unable to vote while the securities are on loan. However, we have the ability to recall shares on loan or to restrict lending when required, in order to ensure all shares have voted. In addition, certain jurisdictions may impose share-blocking restrictions at various times which may prevent AAML from exercising our voting authority.

We recognize that there may situations in which we vote at a company meeting where we encounter a conflict of interest. Such situations include:
• Where a portfolio manager owns the holding in a personal account,
• An investee company that is also a segregated client.
• An investee company where an Executive Director or Officer of our company is also a Director of that company.
• An investee company where an employee of ASI is a Director of that company.
• A significant distributor of our products.
• Any other companies which may be relevant from time to time.where

In order to manage such conflicts of interests, we have established procedures to escalate decision-making so as to ensure that our voting decisions are based on our clients’ best interests and are not impacted by any conflict.

Clients may obtain a free copy of AAML’s proxy voting policies and procedures and/or proxy voting records for their account by contacting us at (+44) 131 246 6071. ASI publish Stewardship Principles, which describe our approach to investment analysis, shareholder engagement and proxy voting across companies worldwide. There are published on our website. Clients that have not granted AAML voting authority over securities held in their accounts will receive their proxies in accordance with the arrangements they have made with their service providers.
please register to get more info

Registered investment advisers are required to provide you with certain financial information or disclosures about ASI’s financial condition. We have no financial commitment that impairs our ability to meet contractual and fiduciary commitments to clients. In addition, we have not been the subject of a bankruptcy proceeding.
APPENDIX A - Fee Schedules
The following are our standard segregated and/or commingled account fee schedules. However, fees and other compensation are negotiated in certain circumstances, and arrangements with any particular client may vary. Equities:
Strategy Minimum Account Size Fee Schedule
Asia Pacific Equities (Regional, Single Country and Property Share) Segregated -$75 million* Commingled- $5 million 1.00% Asia Pacific Small Cap Equity Commingled- $5 million**

1.25%

Australian Equity – Large Cap Segregated -$75 million Commingled- $5 million 0.55% Australian Equity – Small Cap Segregated -$75 million Commingled- $5 million 0.75% Emerging Market Equities Segregated -$100 million*** Commingled- $5 million***

1.00%

Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity

Segregated -$75 million*** Commingled- $5 million***

1.25%

Frontier Markets

Segregated -$75 million**** Commingled- $5 million **** 1.50%

Global Equities (Core and Unconstrained)

Segregated - $75 million* Commingled- $5 million 0.75% Global Small Cap Equities Segregated - $50 million Commingled- $5 million

1.00% Japanese Equity

Segregated - $50 million* Commingled- $5 million 0. 60% Japanese High Alpha Equity Segregated - $50 million* Commingled- $5 million 0. 60%

Japanese Small Cap Equity Segregated - $75 million* Commingled- $5 million

0. 70% Latin American Equity, Emerging Europe, Eastern Europe, Emerging Markets Single Country & Infrastructure Segregated - $75 million Commingled- $5 million 1.00% North American Equity – Large Cap and Core Segregated - $50 million Commingled- $5 million 0.50% North American Equity – Mid Cap Segregated - $25 million Commingled- $5 million 65% North American Equity – Small Cap

Segregated - $25 million Commingled- $5 million

0.75% North American Equity –Multi Cap

Segregated - $50 million Commingled- $5 million

0.60%

UK & European Equity (Mid Cap & Large Cap)

Segregated - $50 million Commingled- $5 million

0.55% on first $75m , 0.45% thereafter

UK & European Equity Small Cap

Segregated - $40 million Commingled- $5 million

0.65% * Segregated investments require Fund Manager approval before proposal. ** Segregated investments in Asian Smaller Companies are at the discretion of AAML. *** Capacity constrained. New business is at the discretion of investment team. **** No discounting and no staggered fees for different fund sizes; Minimum and maximum investment sizes apply at product level

Fixed Income: Strategy Minimum Account Size Fee Schedule

Absolute Return

Segregated - $40 million

0.40%

Asian Fixed Income (Aggregate, Credit/Corporate)

Segregated - $100 million

0.40%

Asian Fixed Income (Government)

Segregated - $100 million

0.30%

Asian Fixed Income (Short Duration)

Segregated - $100million

0.25%

Emerging Markets Fixed Income (Core, Corporate, Local Currency & Plus)

Segregated- $50 million

0.60%

Emerging Markets Fixed Income (Unconstrained)

Segregated- $50 million 0.55% European Fixed Income (Convertibles,High Yield) Segregated - $50 million 0.35% on first €100m; 0.25% thereafter European Fixed Income (Government, Short Duration) Segregated - $50 million 0.20% European Fixed Income (Credit/Corporate, Aggregate Core) Segregated - $50 million 0.25% European Fixed Income (Aggregate Core Plus) Segregated - $50 million

0.30%

Frontier Market Bond

Segregated - $50 million

0.75% Global Absolute Return Bond Negotiable Negotiable

Global Credit

Segregated - $50 million

0.35% on the first $100m, 0.25% thereafter

Global Fixed Income (Aggregate) Segregated - $50 million

0.30% on first $100m, 0.25% on the next $200m, 0.20% thereafter

Global Fixed Income (Government) Segregated - $50 million

0.25% on first $75m; 0.20% thereafter

Global Loans

Segregated - $50 million Commingled- $1 million

Segregated: 0.55% Commingled:0.45%* Global High Yield Segregated - $50 million 0.40% Inflation Linked Segregated - $50 million 0.25% North American Fixed Income (Core, Core Plus, Intermediate and Opportunistic) Segregated - $25 million

0.35% on first $100m 0.20% thereafter North American Fixed Income (Corporate/Credit) Segregated - $25 million

0.28% on first $100m 0.18% thereafter

Structured Product Opportunistic (MBS) Segregated - $25 million

0.75% on the first $25m,0.50% on next $25m;0.35% thereafter

Total Return Bond Segregated - $25 million

0.30% on first $100m, 0.25% on next $150m, 0.20% on next $750m; 0.18% thereafter

Total Return Bond Plus Segregated - $25 million 0.35% on first $100m, 0.30% on next $150m, 0.25% on next $750m; 0.23% thereafter US High Yield Segregated - $50 million 0.40% US Short Duration (Core Short Duration) Segregated - $25 million 0.20% on first $100m, 0.125% thereafter

US Short Duration (Ultra Short Duration) Segregated - $25 million

0.20% on first $100m, 0.09% thereafter

US Cash/Liquidity $25 million

0.125% on first $100m, 0.09% thereafter

UK Fixed Income (Government) Segregated - $50 million 0.20% UK Fixed Income (Aggregate Core) Segregated - $50 million

0.25% on first £100m, 0.15% thereafter

UK Fixed Income (Aggregate Core Plus) Segregated - $50 million

0.30% on first £100m, 0.25% thereafter

UK Fixed Income (Credit/ Corporate) Segregated - $50 million 0.25% UK Fixed Income (Strategic Bond) Segregated - $50 million 0.35%

Liability Driven Investments: Strategy Minimum Account Size Fee Schedule

Liability Driven Investments- Liability Hedge (Execution Only)

Negotiable <$200m: 0.40% $200-500m: 0.35% $500m+: 0.45%

Liability Driven Investments- Liability Hedge (Passive) Negotiable Passive: <$200m: 0.50% $200-500m: 0.45% $500m+: 0.4% Liability Driven Investments- Liability Hedge (Passive Plus) Negotiable <$200m: 0.80% $200-500m: 0.70% $500m+: 0.65%

Liability Driven Investments- Synthetic Overlay (Passive)

Negotiable

0.50% Liability Driven Investments- Synthetic Overlay (Actively Managed) Negotiable <$200m: 0.25% $200+: 0.20% Liability Driven Investments- Synthetic Overlay (Equity TRS/ Futures) Negotiable 0.50% Real Estate:
Strategy
Minimum Account
Size
IMA Only
Direct Property Negotiable* Based on a percentage of the (1) total capital committed by a client for property investments or (2) capital committed to property investments or (3) capital drawn for property investments or (4) market value (net asset value) of a client's portfolio.

Alternatives:
Strategy
Minimum Account
Size
Fee Schedule
Alternative Investment Strategies * Segregated - $50 million Commingled - $200k

Segregated: $50-150m: 0.60% $150-300m: 0.50% $300-500m: 0.45% $500m-$1bn: 0.38%

Commingled: <$50m: 0.70% $50m+: 0.50%

Alternative Risk Premia*

Segregated - negotiable Commingled - $200k

Segregated (Active- managed to model): <$20m: 0.50% $20-50m: 0.35% $50-100m: 0.30%

Segregated (Active- custom): <$20m: 0.60% $20-50m: 0.40% $50-100m: 0.30%

Segregated (Passive): $20-50m: 0.20% $50-100m: 0.15%

Commingled: <$20m: 0.50% $20-50m: 0.30% $50-100m: 0.25%

Asset Manager Minority Investments Negotiable

Management fee of 2% on commitments during investment period, 1.5% on invested thereafter; 20% carry, subject to 8% preferred return, with full catch-up Private Markets Negotiable Segregated: <$100m: 0.55% + 5% performance (over hurdle) $100-300m: 0.50% + 5% performance (over hurdle) $300m+: 0.40% + 5% performance (over hurdle) Commingled: :<$100m: 0.75% on commitments + 10% performance (over hurdle), 100m+: 0.75% on commitments + 5% performance (over hurdle) $300m+: 0.75% on commitments+ 5% performances (over hurdle)

Advisory: >$300K or 0.25% of notional account value Real Assets - Indirect Segregated – negotiable Commingled- $200k

Segregated: <$100m: 0.50% and 3% performance over CPI + 3% over hurdle, $100m - $300m: 0.45% and 3% performance over CPI + 3% over hurdle $300m+: 0.45% and 3% performance over CPI+ 3% over hurdle

Commingled: 0.60% and 3% performance over CPI + 3% over hurdle

Advisory: >$300K or 0.25% of notional account value

Infrastructure Negotiable

Greenfield: <$100m: 1.20%* $100-300m: 1%* $300m+: 0.85%** Brownfield: <$300m: 0.50%** $300m+: 0.45% ** * Department Head has 10% tolerance on rate card fees **Subject to negotiation with fund manager. Multi-Asset: Strategy
Minimum Account
Size First 100m Simple Strategic* £25m

0.35%

Active Strategic*

£25m 0.50%

Active Strategic (Fully Segregated)

£300m

N/A

Diversified Multi-Asset (Fully Segregated)

£500m N/A Global Absolute Return Strategies Negotiable Negotiable *Fees are subject to the minimum fee based on the fee rates of the underlying investments.

Quantitative Mandates: Strategy
Minimum Account
Size First 200m

Traditional Beta-Equity (Global Emerging Markets)

Segregated - $50 million

0.10% Traditional Beta-Equity (All Other Regions)

Segregated - $50 million 0.07% Traditional Beta-Fixed Income (Global Government Emerging Markets)

Segregated - $50 million 0.28% Traditional Beta-Fixed Income (Investment Grade Developed Markets)

Segregated - $50 million 0.12% Traditional Beta-Fixed Income (Global Government Developed Markets and Investment Grade UK)

Segregated - $50 million 0.10% Traditional Beta-Fixed Income (Government UK/ Inflation linked Government UK)

Segregated - $50 million 0.05% Better Beta (Global Emerging Markets) Segregated - $50 0.30% Better Beta (Other Regions) 0.14% Smarter Beta- Multi Factor 0.25% Smarter Beta (RAFI Low Volitility Global Emerging Markets) 0.12% Smarter Beta (RAFI Global, UK, Low Volitity ex-GEM) million 0.10% Machine Learning/ Artificial Intelligence Segregated - $50 million 0.45%

Property Multi-Manager:

Strategy


Minimum Account
Size

Fee Schedule
Global- Core^ $40 million*

<$100m: 0.50% $100m - $300m: 0.35% $300m+: 0.25%

Global- Return Enhancing^ $40 million*

10% performance fee between Range of Target Return, or capped

Global- Value Added/Opportunistic^ $40 million*

Performance fee of 10% above Target Return <$100m: 0.80% $100m - $300m: 0.65% $300m+: 0.50% * Minimum Account Size is negotiable **Performance fee available, depending on risk profile of the fund ^Waterfall fee structure applies Property Funds:
Strategy
Minimum Account
Size
Fee Schedule
European Balanced €3million

€0-25m: 0.90% NAV, €25-50m: 0.80% NAV of excess amount > €50m: 0.70% NAV of excess amount

Pan Nordic €10million (Lower at manager’s discretion) 0.55% bps GAV UK Balanced £1m

Varies from 1.35% for Class A to 0.67% for Class D units

Sweden

SEK50million

kr 0-100m: 0.90% kr100-250m: 0.80% of excess amount >kr250m: 0.70% of excess amount

Finland

Retail: €100k Institutional: €500k

1.0% of GAV

Norway

NOK 5 billion

0.75% of GAV*

German Residential Fund €5million

0.50% of GAV

Aberdeen German Urbanisation Property Fund Class A: €250k Class I: €5 million

Share Class I: €5-20m: 0.65% GAV €20-50m: 0.55% GAV>€50m: 0.45% GAV

Share Class A: 1.25% on GAV (up to 0.60% rebate for intermediaries)

Airport Industrial Property Unit Trust £500k <£325m:0.60% on NAV £325+: 0..55% on NAV *Also subject to Transactions Fees, Performance Fees, Property Management Fees, and Project Management Fees Note: Redemption fees and fees for Letting/Re-Letting not included here please register to get more info