broker-dealers for client transactions and determining the reasonableness of their
compensation (e.g., commissions).
Item 6 – Performance-Based Fees and Side-By-Side Management
APG US’s fee arrangements do not create side-by-side management conflicts between
portfolios because APG US has only one client (APG NL) and charges an aggregate fee for all
services provided. As set forth in Item 5, this fee is calculated on a “cost plus” basis, and not
based on a share of capital gains or capital appreciation of APG US’s client.
Item 7 – Types of Clients
APG US provides investment advisory services exclusively to its parent company, APG NL.
APG NL provides investment advisory services to ABP, other Dutch pension funds, and FGRs
sponsored and controlled by APG NL and whose sole participants are Dutch pension funds.
Item 8 – Methods of Analysis, Investment Strategies and Risk of Loss
Fixed Income Portfolios
Core Bond Plus
The Core Bond Plus strategy uses macroeconomic analysis, credit analysis, and valuation
analysis to form the basis for investment decisions. Collectively, the portfolio management
group evaluates whether interest rates and yield spreads provide attractive returns, based
on an internal assessment of macroeconomics, historical relationships, and market
conditions. The overall level of risk in the portfolio is set accordingly. Through credit
research, analysts measure the health of balance sheets, cash flow, and deal structure to
assess default and event risk. Through valuation analysis, portfolio managers gauge whether
potential investments adequately compensate for prepayment risk, credit risk, interest rate
volatility, and/or changes in market liquidity.
In a portfolio context, bottom-up issue selection is combined with top-down duration
management and sector allocation in a disciplined, quantifiable, and reproducible manner.
As APG US invests in a broad spectrum of fixed income sectors that convey different risks,
diversification of return and alpha sources are essential elements of the investment process.
Derivative transactions, including credit default swaps, may be used for hedging purposes or
efficient portfolio management.
High Yield
The High Yield strategy uses intensive credit analysis, valuation analysis, industry analysis,
and macroeconomic analysis to form the basis for investment decisions. A team of credit
analysts measures the health of issuers’ balance sheets, cash flows, and deal structures to
assess potential default and event risk. Through valuation analysis, portfolio managers
gauge whether potential investments adequately compensate for credit risk. Portfolio
managers create a diversified portfolio by combining this bottom-up issue selection with a
top-down industry allocation. Appropriate industry weightings are determined in light of
internal research and assessment of macroeconomic trends. Derivative transactions,
including credit default swaps, may be used for hedging purposes or efficient portfolio
management.
Investing in fixed income securities involves risk of loss that clients should be
prepared to bear.
The material risks involved in the fixed income strategies and security types employed
include:
a. Systemic Risk – The risk that the value of investments may decline because of economic
changes or other events that affect large portions of the market. This includes changes in
interest rates, inflation expectations, credit spreads, liquidity, and market volatility.
b. Idiosyncratic Risk – The risk that an individual security underperforms relative to the
market.
c. Counterparty Risk – The risk that a counterparty to a transaction fails to meet its
obligations under a mutually negotiated contract.
d. Operational Risk – The risk of loss occurring due to inadequacies in the firm’s operations,
controls, or procedures.
e. Inflation Risk – The risk that the cash flows from investments may be worth less than
expected due to changes in the rate of inflation.
f. Prepayment Risk – The risk that the repayment of principal and future cash flows of an
obligation are accelerated to avoid an obligor paying a higher interest rate.
g. Liquidity Risk – The risk that a ready market for an asset is not deep enough, or an asset
cannot be traded quickly enough to avoid a loss or achieve an expected profit.
Listed Real Estate Portfolios
The Listed Real Estate strategy uses fundamental analysis to form the basis for investment
decisions. The investible universe includes listed equity real estate securities, commonly
known as real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and/or real estate operating companies
(“REOCs”) with assets located in the Americas. The portfolio management team analyzes
economic, real estate market, and capital market trends, as well as fund flows, and surveys
the investible universe (as defined by investment guidelines) to identify companies to
examine in greater detail. The portfolio management team visits companies and markets
regularly to conduct site tours of assets and better understand local real estate dynamics,
and also considers the input of industry sources and third-party research providers to obtain
independent and unbiased opinions about the companies under consideration, real estate
markets, and the economy. Valuation methods employed include, but are not limited to, net
asset value (NAV), price-to-cash-flow multiples, discounted cash flow and price to
replacement cost. The portfolio management team derives conclusions about regional,
property sector, and company-specific investments.
Investing in listed real estate securities involves risk of loss that APG US’s client should be
prepared to bear. The material risks involved in this strategy include:
a. Market Risk – The risk that the value of investments may decline because of economic
changes or other events that affect large portions of the market.
b. Issuer (Unsystematic) Risk – The company or industry specific risk that is inherent in each
investment. The amount of unsystematic risk may be reduced through appropriate
diversification.
c. Counterparty Risk – The risk that a counterparty to a transaction fails to meet its
obligations under a mutually negotiated contract.
d. Operational Risk – The risk of loss occurring due to inadequacies in the firm’s operations,
controls, and procedures.
Private Real Estate Portfolios
The Private Real Estate investment strategy uses quantitative analysis, which relies upon
objective analysis of market conditions and asset valuation and underwriting, in addition to
fundamental research, to form the basis for evaluating investment opportunities. This
qualitative analysis is coupled with in-depth qualitative analysis during the due diligence on
prospective investment managers. This process includes underwriting the investment
managers’ historical track record, investment expertise, and operational proficiency to
evaluate an investment manager’s competency in the stated investment strategy, as well as
complicated governance structures and reporting requirements.
The portfolio management team identifies investment opportunities and seeks to manage
risk by investing in a portfolio that is well diversified over sectors, markets, management
styles, and investment partners. Investments can be made via equity and debt through
companies, funds, joint ventures, and/or co-investments. Generally, there will be a strong
focus on core investments meant to deliver income and growth from stabilized institutional-
quality real estate; however, there can be additional investment strategies that are more
opportunistic in nature and employ a greater level of financial and/or operational risk (e.g.
higher leverage, ground-up development). All proposed private real estate investments are
subject to approval by the APG NL CIP.
Investing in private real estate strategies involves risk of loss that APG US’s client
should be prepared to bear. The material risks involved in this strategy include:
a. Liquidity Risk – Private real estate investments are rather illiquid due to the complexities,
transactions costs, and time horizons associated with trading assets or portfolios. There is
no efficient trading market for these positions.
b. Credit Risk – The risk that tenants default on their lease obligations, by failing to make
rental payments in a timely manner.
c. Market Risk – The risk that the value of investments may decline because of economic
changes or other events that affect large portions of the market.
d. Refinancing Risk – The risk of loss occurring due to the inability to refinance property level
mortgage debt as it becomes due and payable.
e. Operational Risk – The risk of loss occurring due to inadequacies in investment partners’
operations, controls, or procedures.
f. Currency Risk – The risk that returns on investments outside the US could be affected by
currency fluctuations.
Infrastructure Portfolios
The Infrastructure investment strategy focuses on private infrastructure businesses and
assets. It uses quantitative analysis, which relies upon objective analysis of market
conditions and asset valuation and underwriting, in addition to fundamental research, to
form the basis for evaluating investment opportunities. This is coupled with in-depth
qualitative analysis during the due diligence on prospective investee companies and
investment managers. This process includes underwriting the investment
managers’/operating partners’ historical track record, investment expertise, and
operational proficiency to evaluate their competency in the stated investment strategy, as
well as the risk/return profile of investee companies and investment strategies and also
governance structures and reporting requirements.
The portfolio management team identifies investment opportunities and seeks to manage
risk by investing in a portfolio that is well diversified over risk/return profiles, sectors,
markets, and investment partners. Investments can be made via equity and debt through
investee companies, funds, joint ventures, and/or co-investments. Generally, there will be a
strong focus on core investments, meant to deliver income and growth from stabilized
institutional-quality infrastructure assets; however, there can be additional investment
strategies that are more opportunistic in nature and employ a greater level of financial
and/or operational risk (e.g. higher leverage, greenfield assets with construction scope). All
proposed infrastructure investments are subject to approval by the APG NL CIP.
Investing in private infrastructure strategies involves risk of loss that client should be
prepared to bear. The material risks involved in this strategy include:
a. Liquidity Risk – Private infrastructure investments are rather illiquid due to the
complexities, transactions costs and time horizons associated with trading assets or
portfolios. There is no efficient trading market for these positions.
b. Credit Risk – The risk that a counterparty cannot fulfill its obligation, which could cause
the investment to suffer a financial loss.
c. Market Risk – The risk that the value of investments may decline because of economic
changes or other events that affect large portions of the market.
d. Financing Risk – The risk of a loss occurring due to market interest rate movements, the
inability to refinance, or the inability by an investee company to fulfill its obligations towards
providers of debt.
e. Operational Risk – The risk of loss occurring due to inadequacies in investment partners’
operations, controls, or procedures.
f. Currency Risk – The risk that returns on investments outside the US could be affected by
currency fluctuations.
Hedge Funds Portfolio
A portion of the Hedge Fund investment strategy is implemented through third-party
managers proposed by New Holland Capital, LLC (“NHC”). NHC provides this service
pursuant to a non-discretionary investment management agreement with APG US’s client,
APG NL, and certain other entities managed by APG NL. APG US conducts due diligence,
alongside NHC, on all proposed hedge fund managers. All proposed hedge fund investments
made pursuant to the non-discretionary investment management with NHC are subject to
approval by the APG NL CIP. The other portion of the Hedge Fund investment strategy is
implemented through a discretionary fund managed by NHC in which one of the FGRs has
made an investment.
Hedge Fund investments involve risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear.
The material risks involved in this strategy include:
a. Liquidity risk – The risk that underlying hedge fund managers may impose limitations on
redemptions, assign a majority of the hedge funds’ assets to side pockets, or pay out
redemptions in-kind. Consequently, APG US’s client may not be able to liquidate all or a
portion of its hedge fund investments for prolonged periods of time.
b. Control risk – The risk that once an investment in a hedge fund is made, clients cannot
control the hedge fund manager’s choice of investments or investment decisions.
c. Diversification risk – Because the strategy is implemented by allocating funds to dozens of
managers who make independent trading decisions, it is possible that one or more of such
managers may, at any time, take investment positions that are opposite of positions taken by
other managers. It is also possible that the underlying managers may, on occasion be
competing with each other for similar positions at the same time, and the resulting lack of
diversification may subject client’s investments to more rapid changes in value than would
be the case if assets were more widely diversified.
d. Transparency risk – The risk that APG US or NHC may not be aware of underlying
managers’ deviations from investment strategies or guidelines, investment style drift,
regulatory violations, or fraud.
Private Equity Portfolio
The Private Equity investment strategy is implemented primarily through investments in
private equity co-mingled funds, the managers of which are selected by an in-house team.
APG US conducts due diligence on private equity fund managers with an evaluation of the
investment managers’ historical track record, investment expertise, strategy, and team
stability to evaluate the managers’ competence and ability to record and report upon their
performance.
The portfolio managers seek to manage risk by diversifying over vintage year, geography,
style, and stage of investing. In addition to primary fund investing, there are also secondary
purchases of partnership interests and co-investments directly into portfolio companies. All
proposed private equity fund investments are subject to approval by the APG NL CIP and
proposed private equity co-investments are subject to approval by the APG US Private Equity
Co-Investment and Secondary investment Committee.
Investing in private equity strategies involves risk of loss that the clients should be
prepared to bear.
The material risks involved in this strategy include:
a. Liquidity risk – Private equity investments are illiquid due to the complexities, transaction
costs, and time horizons associated with trading assets or portfolios. There is a secondary
market but each secondary transaction is privately negotiated and, hence, not an efficient
market place for trading positions.
b. Credit Risk – Underlying portfolio companies within a private equity fund are often highly
leveraged and there is risk of default if the company’s performance does not generate
significant cash flow to meet its debt obligations.
c. Market Risk – The risk that the value of investments may decline because of economic
changes or other events that affect large portions of the market.
d. Refinancing Risk – The risk that underlying portfolio companies may not be able to achieve
a refinancing when their debt becomes due.
e. Operational Risk – The risk of loss due to inadequacies in the underlying companies’
operations, controls and procedures.
f. Currency Risk – The risk that returns on investments outside of the US could be affected by
currency fluctuations.
g. Control Risk – The risk that once an investment in a private equity fund is made, the client
cannot control the private equity manager’s choice of investments or investment decisions.
h. Transparency Risk – The risk that APG US may not be aware of underlying managers’
deviations from investment strategies or guidelines, investment style drift, regulatory
violations, or fraud.
Focus Equities North America
In 2019, APG NL’s Focus Equities team launched a North American portfolio to complement
its European portfolio. This fund is managed by APG NL and traded out of the Netherlands.
The intention of the Focus Equities team is to be a passive investor in public companies and
to hold average company stakes of approximately 5%. Certain APG US investment personnel
provide advice to APG NL in connection with the management of the Focus Equities North
American portfolio.
General Risks Applicable to all Portfolios and Strategies
In addition to the risks discussed above, which relate to the specific strategies of APG US’s
portfolios, certain general risks apply to all of the above portfolios. These risks include:
a. Possibility of Fraud and Other Misconduct of Employees and Service Providers –
Misconduct by employees of APG US, service providers to APG US and or its affiliates could
cause significant losses to APG NL, client accounts and affiliated accounts. Misconduct may
include entering into transactions without authorization, the failure to comply with
operational and risk procedures, including due diligence procedures, misrepresentations as
to investments being considered by such affiliated accounts and client accounts, the
improper use or disclosure of confidential or material non-public information, which could
result in litigation, regulatory enforcement or serious financial harm, including limiting the
business prospects or future marketing activities of APG NL and its and noncompliance with
applicable laws or regulations and the concealing of any of the foregoing. Such activities may
result in reputational damage, litigation, business disruption and/or financial losses to APG
NL. APG NL has controls and procedures through which they seek to minimize the risk of
such misconduct occurring. However, no assurances can be given that APG NL will be able to
identify or prevent such misconduct.
b. Coronavirus Outbreak Risks – The recent global outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus
(“COVID-19”), together with resulting restrictions on travel and quarantines imposed, has
meaningfully disrupted the global economy and markets. Although the long-term economic
fallout of COVID-19 is difficult to predict, it has and is likely to contribute to market volatility
and is also likely to lead to an economic slowdown given the disruption to supply chains and
economic activity across sectors and industries worldwide. The applicability, or lack thereof,
of force majeure provisions could also come into question in connection with contracts that
affiliated accounts have entered into, which could ultimately work to their detriment. To the
extent an epidemic, including COVID-19, is present in jurisdictions in which APG US or its
affiliates has offices or other operations or investments, it could affect the ability of APG US
to operate effectively, including the ability of personnel to function, communicate and travel
to the extent necessary to carry out APG NL’s investment strategies and objectives. APG NL
and its affiliates may also suffer losses and other adverse impacts if travel and other COVID-
19-related disruptions continue for an extended period of time. In addition, APG US’s
personnel and personnel of critical service providers to APG US may be directly impacted by
the spread of COVID-19, both through direct exposure (the likelihood of which can increase
due to the frequency of travel) and exposure to family members, which could impair APG
US’s ability to satisfy its obligations to APG NL and its affiliates, their investors, and pursuant
to applicable law. The spread of COVID-19 among APG US’s personnel has the potential to
significantly affect APG US’s ability to properly oversee client accounts (particularly to the
extent such impacted personnel include key investment professionals or other members of
senior management).
Item 9 – Disciplinary Information
Registered investment advisers are required to disclose all material facts regarding any legal
or disciplinary events that would be material to clients’ evaluation of the investment advisers
or the integrity of the advisers’ management. APG US has no information applicable to this
Item.
Item 10 – Other Financial Industry Activities and Affiliations
APG US provides investment advisory services exclusively to APG NL advised portfolios.
APG US does not believe that this relationship creates a conflict of interests for APG NL or for
APG NL advised portfolios.
Item 11 – Code of Ethics, Participation in Client Transactions and Personal Trading
APG US has adopted a Code of Ethics for all supervised persons of the firm describing its high
standard of business conduct and fiduciary duty to its client. The Code of Ethics includes
provisions relating to the confidentiality of client information, a prohibition on insider
trading, restrictions on the acceptance of significant gifts and the reporting of certain gifts
and business entertainment items, and personal securities trading procedures, among other
things.
The Code of Ethics (the “Code”) is designed to assure that the personal securities
transactions, activities, and interests of the employees of APG US will not interfere with (i)
making decisions in the best interest of APG US’s client and (ii) implementing such decisions
while, at the same time, allowing employees to invest for their own accounts. Under the Code,
certain classes of securities have been designated as exempt transactions, based upon a
determination that these would not interfere materially with the best interest of APG US’s
client. In addition, the Code requires pre-clearance of many transactions, and generally
prohibits trading in securities that are held by portfolios managed by APG US, with the
exception of Treasury securities or if the supervised person is granted a written hardship
waiver by the Chief Compliance Officer. Employee trading is continually monitored under
the Code of Ethics to reasonably prevent and detect conflicts of interests between APG US
and its client.
All supervised persons at APG US must acknowledge the terms of the Code of Ethics, both
within 10 days of hire and annually, or as necessary when material amendments to the Code
are adopted. APG US’s client may request a copy of the Code of Ethics by contacting the firm’s
Chief Compliance Officer, Evan Gordon.
Certain affiliated accounts may trade in the same securities with client accounts on an
aggregated basis when consistent with APG US’s obligation to seek best execution. In such
circumstances, the affiliated and client accounts will share commission costs equally and
receive securities at a total average price. APG US will retain records of the trade order
(specifying each participating account) and its allocation, which will be completed prior to
the entry of the aggregated order. Completed orders will be allocated as specified in the
initial trade order. Partially filled orders will be allocated on a pro rata basis. Any exceptions
will be explained on the order.
Due to the fact that APG US is indirectly substantially owned by a Dutch pension fund (ABP)
that has a significant ownership interest in most of the portfolios advised by APG US, it is
very likely that APG US will also recommend or effect for other accounts the purchase or sale
of securities in which ABP holds a direct or indirect interest, when consistent with
investment guidelines and objectives. Similarly, APG US’s affiliates in the Netherlands are
also likely to recommend or effect for other accounts the purchase or sale of securities in
which ABP holds a direct or indirect interest.
It is APG US’s policy that the firm will not effect any principal transactions unless in
compliance with the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or guidance provided in SEC Division
of Investment Management No-Action Letters. APG US’s affiliates in the Netherlands may
effect principal transactions in the Netherlands in compliance with applicable Dutch
regulations. Principal transactions are generally defined as transactions where an adviser,
acting as principal for its own account or the account of an affiliate, buys from or sells any
security to any advisory client. A principal transaction may also be deemed to have occurred
if a security is crossed between an affiliated hedge fund and another client account.
Factors Considered in Selecting or Recommending Broker-Dealers for Client Transactions
Brokers are selected based on quantitative factors (price and/or commission rates) and
qualitative factors such as execution capability, financial responsibility, reputation,
responsiveness, value of research provided, and the ability to engage in block transactions
with attendant volume discounts. Counterparty exposure limits may also be a factor in
broker selection. Trades may only be executed through brokers on APG US’s approved
broker list.
Research and Other Soft Dollar Benefits
APG US may enter into Commission Sharing Arrangements and/or pay brokers higher than
the lowest commission available to compensate brokers for providing research products or
services (“soft dollars”). Because investment advisers that obtain products or services with
soft dollars do not have to pay for those services with their own funds, such arrangements
may create an incentive for investment advisers to disregard their best execution
responsibilities in order to earn credits for “soft dollar” products or services. Section 28(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 addresses this conflict by allowing investment
advisers to pay higher commissions than are otherwise available to obtain certain brokerage
and research services, if those services provide assistance to the investment adviser in
carrying out its investment decision-making responsibilities.
APG US may obtain proprietary or third-party research related to the market for securities
or advice on market color. Soft dollar benefits may not necessarily be proportionately
allocated and may not be limited to those portfolios that may have generated a particular
benefit.
To ensure that the amount of commissions paid is reasonable in relation to the value of the
brokerage and research services received, portfolio managers and traders estimate,
document, and review the quality of the services received on an ongoing basis versus the
level of commissions paid to each broker that provides research services.
In order to comply with MiFID II and APG NL guidelines, APG NL may, if possible, purchase
certain research services, as defined for purposes of MiFID II, on behalf of APG US.
Brokerage for Client Referrals
APG US does not receive client referrals from brokers.
Directed Brokerage
The client may direct APG US to use certain brokers or counterparties, in which case it is the
client’s responsibility to evaluate such brokers or counterparties. APG US will seek to obtain
best execution while complying with client instructions to the extent possible.
Aggregation of Trades
APG US may aggregate portfolio trades if consistent with best execution and the needs of
each portfolio participating in the aggregated trade.
please register to get more info